§
In re Luis-Rodriguez

58 Cited authorities

  1. Chevron U.S.A. v. Natural Res. Def. Council

    467 U.S. 837 (1984)   Cited 16,199 times   616 Legal Analyses
    Holding that courts "must give effect to the unambiguously expressed intent of Congress"

  2. Spencer v. Kemna

    523 U.S. 1 (1998)   Cited 5,759 times   2 Legal Analyses
    Holding that habeas petition had become moot after petitioner was released from second stint of incarceration following parole revocation because he had failed to show that "time between parole revocation and expiration of sentence is always so short as to evade review" and that he again likely would face parole revocation

  3. INS v. Elias-Zacarias

    502 U.S. 478 (1992)   Cited 5,172 times
    Holding that central to the asylum statute is that persecution must be on account of a statutorily protected ground, making the assailant's "motive critical"

  4. Colorado v. Connelly

    479 U.S. 157 (1986)   Cited 4,911 times   12 Legal Analyses
    Holding that the government bears the burden of proving the validity of a Miranda waiver by a preponderance of the evidence

  5. Lewis v. Continental Bank Corp.

    494 U.S. 472 (1990)   Cited 3,447 times   7 Legal Analyses
    Holding mootness destroys subject-matter jurisdiction

  6. INS v. Cardoza-Fonseca

    480 U.S. 421 (1987)   Cited 2,407 times   4 Legal Analyses
    Holding that the phrase "well-founded fear," which is also found in 8 U.S.C. § 1101, is ambiguous

  7. Russello v. United States

    464 U.S. 16 (1983)   Cited 2,125 times   6 Legal Analyses
    Holding that where "Congress includes particular language in one section of a statute but omits it in another section of the same Act," courts presume that "Congress acts intentionally and purposely in the disparate inclusion or exclusion"

  8. Kerr v. U.S. Dist. Court

    426 U.S. 394 (1976)   Cited 2,108 times   4 Legal Analyses
    Holding that "as a means of implementing the rule that the writ will issue only in extraordinary circumstances," the party seeking the writ must "have no other adequate means to attain the relief he desires"

  9. Woodby v. Immigration Service

    385 U.S. 276 (1966)   Cited 753 times
    Holding that "no deportation order may be entered unless it is found by clear, unequivocal, and convincing evidence that the facts alleged as grounds for deportation are true"

  10. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Amax Coal Co.

    453 U.S. 322 (1981)   Cited 366 times
    Holding that a management-appointed trustee to a multiemployer pension plan could not be considered a management representative

  11. Section 1252 - Judicial review of orders of removal

    8 U.S.C. § 1252   Cited 43,197 times   37 Legal Analyses
    Holding court had no jurisdiction to review "any judgment regarding the granting of relief under section . . . 1229b"

  12. Section 2 - Principals

    18 U.S.C. § 2   Cited 24,355 times   59 Legal Analyses
    Holding aiders and abettors punishable as principals under federal criminal law

  13. Section 371 - Conspiracy to commit offense or to defraud United States

    18 U.S.C. § 371   Cited 21,865 times   143 Legal Analyses
    Requiring proof of an "act to effect the object of the conspiracy"

  14. Section 1182 - Inadmissible aliens

    8 U.S.C. § 1182   Cited 9,900 times   69 Legal Analyses
    Holding deportable aliens who have been convicted of "crimes involving moral turpitude"

  15. Section 802 - Definitions

    21 U.S.C. § 802   Cited 4,052 times   85 Legal Analyses
    Excluding hemp from the schedules

  16. Section 1251 - Transferred

    8 U.S.C. § 1251   Cited 2,159 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Delineating crimes that make alien deportable

  17. Section 1254 - Repealed

    8 U.S.C. § 1254   Cited 1,132 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Describing suspension-of-deportation eligibility

  18. Section 1831 - Economic espionage

    18 U.S.C. § 1831   Cited 352 times   85 Legal Analyses
    Holding liable for economic espionage "[w]hoever, intending or knowing that the offense will benefit any foreign government ... knowingly ... without authorization appropriates, takes, carries away, or conceals" trade secrets

  19. Section 611 - Definitions

    22 U.S.C. § 611   Cited 194 times   27 Legal Analyses
    Defining "foreign principal" for purposes of FARA to include foreign governments, foreign political parties, certain individuals outside the United States, and foreign private businesses

  20. Section 793 - Gathering, transmitting or losing defense information

    18 U.S.C. § 793   Cited 191 times   4 Legal Analyses
    Referring to § 793 "for the purpose aforesaid"