§
In re L.L.P.

20 Cited authorities

  1. Chevron U.S.A. v. Natural Res. Def. Council

    467 U.S. 837 (1984)   Cited 16,016 times   500 Legal Analyses
    Holding that courts "must give effect to the unambiguously expressed intent of Congress"

  2. Robinson v. Shell Oil Co.

    519 U.S. 337 (1997)   Cited 2,470 times   16 Legal Analyses
    Holding that the term “employees” carries a different meaning in different sections of Title VII

  3. Bostock v. Clayton County

    140 S. Ct. 1731 (2020)   Cited 968 times   105 Legal Analyses
    Holding that "[a]n employer who fires an individual merely for being gay or transgender defies [Title VII]"

  4. National Cable Telecom. Assn. v. Brand X Internet S

    545 U.S. 967 (2005)   Cited 1,172 times   41 Legal Analyses
    Holding that an agency is free within "the limits of reasoned interpretation to change course" only if it "adequately justifies the change"

  5. Carr v. U.S.

    560 U.S. 438 (2010)   Cited 275 times   6 Legal Analyses
    Holding that because SORNA "sets forth [its] travel requirement in the present tense," the statute's criminal penalties do not apply to a person whose interstate travel predated enactment

  6. John Hancock Mut. Life Ins. Co. v. Harris Trust

    510 U.S. 86 (1993)   Cited 213 times   2 Legal Analyses
    Holding that variable annuities are not exempt from ERISA

  7. Republic of Sudan v. Harrison

    139 S. Ct. 1048 (2019)   Cited 88 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Adopting mailbox rule for determining when a contractual offer has been accepted

  8. Barrett v. United States

    423 U.S. 212 (1976)   Cited 261 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Holding that a firearm "has been" shipped in interstate commerce where the defendant purchased the weapon from a vendor within his state of Kentucky, but the weapon was manufactured in Massachusetts, shipped to North Carolina, and then received by the vendor in Kentucky

  9. Weinberger v. Rossi

    456 U.S. 25 (1982)   Cited 154 times
    Holding that term "treaty" also extends to executive agreements

  10. Martinez-Perez v. Barr

    947 F.3d 1273 (10th Cir. 2020)   Cited 48 times
    In Martinez-Perez v. Barr, 947 F.3d 1273 (10th Cir. 2020), we held that a statutorily defective NTA does not deprive the IJ of jurisdiction because § 1229(a) is a claim-processing rule, not a jurisdiction-conferring requirement.

  11. Section 1182 - Inadmissible aliens

    8 U.S.C. § 1182   Cited 9,711 times   66 Legal Analyses
    Holding deportable aliens who have been convicted of "crimes involving moral turpitude"

  12. Section 1229b - Cancellation of removal; adjustment of status

    8 U.S.C. § 1229b   Cited 5,075 times   24 Legal Analyses
    Granting the Attorney General discretion to cancel the removal of an alien who has “been battered or subjected to extreme cruelty by a ... parent who is ... a United States citizen”

  13. Section 1240.8 - Burdens of proof in removal proceedings

    8 C.F.R. § 1240.8   Cited 304 times   4 Legal Analyses
    Applying "clearly and beyond doubt" burden to "proceedings commenced upon a respondent's arrival" or "[a]liens present in the United States without being admitted"