§
In re Koat

20 Cited authorities

  1. Mathis v. United States

    136 S. Ct. 2243 (2016)   Cited 4,466 times   7 Legal Analyses
    Holding that a court employing the categorical approach "looks to a limited class of documents"

  2. Descamps v. United States

    570 U.S. 254 (2013)   Cited 5,062 times   23 Legal Analyses
    Holding that courts "may look only to the statutory definitions—i.e ., the elements—of a defendant’s prior offenses"

  3. Shepard v. U.S.

    544 U.S. 13 (2005)   Cited 4,287 times   24 Legal Analyses
    Holding that courts may consult "the charging document . . . or . . . some comparable judicial record of this information"

  4. Taylor v. United States

    495 U.S. 575 (1990)   Cited 5,311 times   27 Legal Analyses
    Holding that the term "burglary" as used in the Armed Career Criminal Act was to be given its "generic, contemporary meaning" to avoid a scenario in which "a person ... would, or would not, receive a sentence enhancement based on exactly the same conduct, depending on whether the State of his prior conviction happened to call that conduct ‘burglary’ "

  5. Moncrieffe v. Holder

    569 U.S. 184 (2013)   Cited 1,393 times   15 Legal Analyses
    Holding that sharing marijuana not an aggravated felony

  6. INS v. Bagamasbad

    429 U.S. 24 (1976)   Cited 868 times
    Holding no requirement "to arrive at purely advisory findings and conclusions as to statutory eligibility" for immigration relief when application fails for other reasons

  7. Passmore v. Astrue

    533 F.3d 658 (8th Cir. 2008)   Cited 95 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Holding ALJ did not abuse discretion where claimant failed to establish cross-examination of subpoenaed physician was reasonably necessary where he failed to show the import of the testimony or why interrogatories were not sufficient

  8. State v. Schiebout

    944 N.W.2d 666 (Iowa 2020)   Cited 47 times

    No. 18-0081 06-05-2020 STATE of Iowa, Appellee, v. Kamie Jo SCHIEBOUT, Appellant. Mark C. Smith (until withdrawal) and Martha J. Lucey, State Appellate Defender, and Mary K. Conroy, Assistant Appellate Defender, for appellant. Thomas J. Miller, Attorney General, Thomas J. Ogden, Assistant Attorney General, and Thomas Kunstle, County Attorney, for appellee. McDERMOTT, Justice. Mark C. Smith (until withdrawal) and Martha J. Lucey, State Appellate Defender, and Mary K. Conroy, Assistant Appellate Defender

  9. State v. Nall

    894 N.W.2d 514 (Iowa 2017)   Cited 33 times
    Holding that where a statute is ambiguous, the court may utilize tools of statutory construction

  10. State v. Hogrefe

    557 N.W.2d 871 (Iowa 1996)   Cited 59 times
    Reversing conviction based on general verdict of guilty, where three theories were submitted to jury but only one was supported by substantial evidence, because there was "no way of determining which theory the jury accepted"

  11. Section 1101 - Definitions

    8 U.S.C. § 1101   Cited 16,882 times   92 Legal Analyses
    Finding notice and comment rulemaking is required for the agency's interim rule recognizing fear of coercive family practices as basis for refugee status

  12. Section 1227 - Deportable aliens

    8 U.S.C. § 1227   Cited 8,091 times   42 Legal Analyses
    Granting this discretion to the Attorney General

  13. Section 714.1 - Theft defined

    Iowa Code § 714.1   Cited 443 times
    Making it a criminal offense for a party to make, utter, deliver, or give any check to obtain property in return, knowing that the bank will not honor the check when presented

  14. Section 714.2 - Degrees of theft

    Iowa Code § 714.2   Cited 269 times
    Setting out the degrees of theft under Iowa law