In re J.G.T.

29 Cited authorities

  1. U.S. v. Hankey

    203 F.3d 1160 (9th Cir. 2000)   Cited 667 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Holding that "far from requiring trial judges to mechanically apply the Daubert factors — or something like them — to both scientific and non-scientific testimony, Kumho Tire heavily emphasizes that judges are entitled to broad discretion when discharging their gatekeeping function"
  2. U.S. v. Brown

    415 F.3d 1257 (11th Cir. 2005)   Cited 503 times
    Holding that Rule 702 ’s requirements are "more relaxed in a bench trial situation, where the judge is serving as factfinder and we are not concerned about dumping a barrage of questionable scientific evidence on a jury"
  3. Cole v. Holder

    659 F.3d 762 (9th Cir. 2011)   Cited 361 times
    Holding that "misstating the record and failing to mention highly probative or potentially dispositive evidence" indicates that the agency failed to consider all the evidence
  4. Davila v. Barr

    968 F.3d 1136 (9th Cir. 2020)   Cited 140 times
    Holding that the agency erred by selectively citing evidence
  5. Chand v. I.N.S.

    222 F.3d 1066 (9th Cir. 2000)   Cited 218 times
    Holding that record compelled finding of past persecution where petitioner was the victim of violence three times, repeatedly robbed over the course of a few years, and had his house vandalized and his belongings stolen
  6. Ali v. Holder

    637 F.3d 1025 (9th Cir. 2011)   Cited 136 times
    Confining our review to grounds relied upon by the Board
  7. Sowe v. Mukasey

    538 F.3d 1281 (9th Cir. 2008)   Cited 123 times
    Finding rebutted, for similar reasons, any presumption of future persecution by the RUF
  8. Bromfield v. Mukasey

    543 F.3d 1071 (9th Cir. 2008)   Cited 98 times
    Holding that the jurisdiction stripping provision found at 8 U.S.C. § 1252(C) applies only to removal orders, not to applications for asylum, withholding of removal, or CAT relief
  9. U.S. v. Mamah

    332 F.3d 475 (7th Cir. 2003)   Cited 114 times
    Holding that the district court did not err in excluding expert testimony regarding the defendant's (a Ghanaian immigrant) susceptibility to FBI interrogation tactics, because there was no "empirical link between [the experts'] research and the opinion that [the defendant] likely gave a false confession"
  10. Lopez-Umanzor v. Gonzales

    405 F.3d 1049 (9th Cir. 2005)   Cited 90 times
    Holding that the IJ's refusal to hear petitioner's experts' testimony violated due process
  11. Rule 702 - Testimony by Expert Witnesses

    Fed. R. Evid. 702   Cited 27,608 times   281 Legal Analyses
    Adopting the Daubert standard
  12. Section 1101 - Definitions

    8 U.S.C. § 1101   Cited 16,704 times   91 Legal Analyses
    Finding notice and comment rulemaking is required for the agency's interim rule recognizing fear of coercive family practices as basis for refugee status
  13. Rule 401 - Test for Relevant Evidence

    Fed. R. Evid. 401   Cited 13,898 times   36 Legal Analyses
    Stating that evidence is relevant when "it has any tendency to make a fact more or less probable"
  14. Section 1158 - Asylum

    8 U.S.C. § 1158   Cited 10,666 times   6 Legal Analyses
    Holding a "pattern or practice" of persecution requires it be "systemic, pervasive, or organized"
  15. Section 1229a - Removal proceedings

    8 U.S.C. § 1229a   Cited 6,398 times   8 Legal Analyses
    Granting a noncitizen the right to file one motion to reopen and providing that “the motion to reopen shall be filed within 90 days of the date of entry of a final administrative order of removal”
  16. Rule 703 - Bases of an Expert's Opinion Testimony

    Fed. R. Evid. 703   Cited 4,926 times   27 Legal Analyses
    Explaining that facts or data of a type upon which experts in the field would reasonably rely in forming an opinion need not be admissible in order for the expert's opinion based on the facts and data to be admitted
  17. Rule 602 - Need for Personal Knowledge

    Fed. R. Evid. 602   Cited 3,616 times   13 Legal Analyses
    Stating that " witness may testify only if evidence is introduced sufficient to support a finding that the witness has personal knowledge of the matter"
  18. Section 1324d - Civil penalties for failure to depart

    8 U.S.C. § 1324d   Cited 16 times
    Providing civil penalties for similar conduct
  19. Section 1003.10 - Immigration judges

    8 C.F.R. § 1003.10   Cited 85 times
    Authorizing Director to "designate . . . temporary immigration judges for renewable terms not to exceed six months"
  20. Section 280.53 - Civil monetary penalties inflation adjustment

    8 C.F.R. § 280.53   1 Legal Analyses

    (a)Statutory authority. In accordance with the requirements of the Federal Civil Penalties Inflation Adjustment Act of 1990, Public Law 101-410 , 104 Stat. 890, as amended by the Federal Civil Penalties Inflation Adjustment Act Improvements Act of 2015, Public Law 114-74 , Sec. 701, 129 Stat . 599, the civil monetary penalties listed in paragraph (b) of this section are adjusted as provided in paragraph (b). (b)Adjustment of penalties. For violations occurring on or before November 2, 2015, the penalty