§
In re J- L- L-

14 Cited authorities

  1. Pereira v. Sessions

    138 S. Ct. 2105 (2018)   Cited 1,072 times   2 Legal Analyses
    Holding that an NTA that omitted the "time or place of the removal proceedings" failed to comply with the requirements of § 239 and was insufficient to trigger the so-called "stop-time rule" of INA § 240A(d)

  2. Niz-Chavez v. Garland

    141 S. Ct. 1474 (2021)   Cited 408 times   3 Legal Analyses
    Holding that an NTA must consist of "a single document" containing all requisite information

  3. Chery v. Garland

    16 F.4th 980 (2d Cir. 2021)   Cited 42 times
    Concluding that a New York statute was divisible because the statute's plain text suggested "that either a 'hallucinogenic substance other than marijuana' or a 'narcotic substance' [must be] involved" in a violation, and distinguishing the indivisible statute in Harbin, which, by contrast, criminalized selling "controlled substance" generally

  4. Maradia v. Garland

    18 F.4th 458 (5th Cir. 2021)   Cited 6 times

    No. 20-60714 11-17-2021 Shahid Ashan MARADIA, also known as Shahid Maredia, also known as Saiycdali Momin, Petitioner, v. Merrick GARLAND, U.S. Attorney General, Respondent. James W. Parker, Willy, Nanayakkara & Associates, Stafford, TX, for Petitioner. Micah Engler, U.S. Department of Justice, Civil Division/OIL, for Respondent. Haynes, Circuit Judge James W. Parker, Willy, Nanayakkara & Associates, Stafford, TX, for Petitioner. Micah Engler, U.S. Department of Justice, Civil Division/OIL, for Respondent

  5. Perez-Perez v. Wilkinson

    988 F.3d 371 (7th Cir. 2021)   Cited 5 times
    Holding that Pereira did not apply to the petitioner's petition for review of the BIA's denial of his motion to reopen his deportation proceedings because the OSC was governed by a different statute with different requirements than the one at issue in Pereira

  6. Naizhu Jiang v. Garland

    18 F.4th 730 (2d Cir. 2021)   Cited 3 times

    No. 19-1911 August Term 2021 11-24-2021 Naizhu JIANG, Petitioner, v. Merrick B. GARLAND, United States Attorney General, Respondent. Meer M. M. Rahman, New York, NY, for Petitioner. Joseph H. Hunt, Assistant Attorney General; Leslie McKay & Margot L. Carter, Senior Litigation Counsel, Office of Immigration Litigation, United States Department of Justice, Washington, DC, for Respondent. PER CURIAM. Meer M. M. Rahman, New York, NY, for Petitioner. Joseph H. Hunt, Assistant Attorney General; Leslie

  7. Section 1229b - Cancellation of removal; adjustment of status

    8 U.S.C. § 1229b   Cited 5,200 times   24 Legal Analyses
    Granting the Attorney General discretion to cancel the removal of an alien who has “been battered or subjected to extreme cruelty by a ... parent who is ... a United States citizen”

  8. Section 1226 - Apprehension and detention of aliens

    8 U.S.C. § 1226   Cited 3,219 times   22 Legal Analyses
    Ruling that no court may set aside an immigration judge's "discretionary judgment any action or decision . . . regarding the detention or release of any alien or the grant, revocation, or denial of bond or parole"

  9. Section 1229 - Initiation of removal proceedings

    8 U.S.C. § 1229   Cited 1,373 times   6 Legal Analyses
    Authorizing service by mail

  10. Section 1225 - Inspection by immigration officers; expedited removal of inadmissible arriving aliens; referral for hearing

    8 U.S.C. § 1225   Cited 1,297 times   16 Legal Analyses
    Setting standard for credible fear as "a significant possibility, taking into account the ... statements made by the alien ... and such other facts as are known to the officer, that the alien could establish eligibility for asylum"

  11. Section 1252b - Repealed

    8 U.S.C. § 1252b   Cited 397 times
    Stating that time-and-place information could be provided "in the order to show cause or otherwise"

  12. Section 1003.2 - Reopening or reconsideration before the Board of Immigration Appeals

    8 C.F.R. § 1003.2   Cited 7,797 times   7 Legal Analyses
    Granting power to Board

  13. Section 1003.13 - Definitions

    8 C.F.R. § 1003.13   Cited 156 times
    Defining "charging document"

  14. Section 235.6 - Referral to immigration judge

    8 C.F.R. § 235.6

    (a)Notice - (1)Referral by Form I-862, Notice to Appear. An immigration officer or asylum officer will sign and deliver a Form I-862 to an alien in the following cases: (i) If, in accordance with the provisions of section 235(b)(2)(A) of the Act, the examining immigration officer detains an alien for a proceeding before an immigration judge under section 240 of the Act; or (ii) If an immigration officer verifies that an alien subject to expedited removal under section 235(b)(1) of the Act has been