§
In re Ibarra

12 Cited authorities

  1. Mathis v. United States

    136 S. Ct. 2243 (2016)   Cited 4,434 times   7 Legal Analyses
    Holding that a court employing the categorical approach "looks to a limited class of documents"

  2. Taylor v. United States

    495 U.S. 575 (1990)   Cited 5,288 times   27 Legal Analyses
    Holding that the term "burglary" as used in the Armed Career Criminal Act was to be given its "generic, contemporary meaning" to avoid a scenario in which "a person ... would, or would not, receive a sentence enhancement based on exactly the same conduct, depending on whether the State of his prior conviction happened to call that conduct ‘burglary’ "

  3. Scheidler v. National Organization for Women, Inc.

    537 U.S. 393 (2003)   Cited 389 times   5 Legal Analyses
    Holding that liability for extortion under RICO, which prohibits an "act or threat involving ... extortion ... which is chargeable under State law," did not depend on conduct that violated a state statute expressly prohibiting "extortion," but, instead, need only violate a statute "capable of being generically classified as extortionate."

  4. U.S. v. Corona-Sanchez

    291 F.3d 1201 (9th Cir. 2002)   Cited 286 times
    Holding that a presentence report may establish the fact of a prior conviction where the defendant does not contest that he was not convicted under the relevant statute

  5. U.S. v. Becerril-Lopez

    541 F.3d 881 (9th Cir. 2008)   Cited 171 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Holding that defendant could be convicted of violating California robbery statute by making "mere threats to property, such as ‘Give me $10 or I’ll key your car’ or ‘Open the cash register or I’ll tag your windows’ "

  6. Lopez-Valencia v. Lynch

    798 F.3d 863 (9th Cir. 2015)   Cited 109 times
    Holding that California theft is not a theft offense because it could be committed through theft by false pretenses

  7. Penuliar v. Gonzales

    435 F.3d 961 (9th Cir. 2005)   Cited 31 times
    Adding an asterisk to the caption tied to a footnote to indicate "Alberto R. Gonzales is substituted for his predecessor, John Ashcroft, as Attorney General of the United States. . . ."

  8. Mena v. Lynch

    820 F.3d 114 (4th Cir. 2016)   Cited 12 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Holding that federal receipt of embezzled property is not a theft offense because "[b]y definition, embezzlement ... involves property that came into the initial wrongdoer's hands with the owner's consent"

  9. Chapling v. Mukasey

    267 F. App'x 516 (9th Cir. 2008)

    No. 04-72860. Submitted February 13, 2008. The panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed.R.App.P. 34(a)(2). Filed February 15, 2008. Daniel Matthew Wigon, Sacramento, CA, for Petitioner. Regional Counsel, Western Region Immigration Naturalization Service, Laguna Niguel, CA, Emily A. Radford, Esq., Thomas K. Ragland, DOJ-U.S. Department of Justice Civil Div./Office of Immigration Lit., Washington, DC, for Respondent. On Petition for Review of an Order of

  10. People v. Goodman

    159 Cal.App.2d 54 (Cal. Ct. App. 1958)   Cited 44 times
    In People v. Goodman, 159 Cal.App.2d 54, 323 P.2d 536 (1958), under the similar statute the court upheld a conviction wherein the defendant by means of extortion secured checks drawn on a bank account and signed by the victim.

  11. Section 1101 - Definitions

    8 U.S.C. § 1101   Cited 16,719 times   91 Legal Analyses
    Finding notice and comment rulemaking is required for the agency's interim rule recognizing fear of coercive family practices as basis for refugee status

  12. Section 1227 - Deportable aliens

    8 U.S.C. § 1227   Cited 8,036 times   41 Legal Analyses
    Granting this discretion to the Attorney General