§
IN RE HO

3 Citing briefs

  1. Hu et al v. Johnson et al

    MOTION to Dismiss for Lack of Jurisdiction

    Filed October 6, 2016

    Comprehensive Business Plan Matter of Ho held that a “comprehensive business plan as contemplated by the regulations should contain, at a minimum, a description of the business, its products and/or services, and its objectives.” 22 I&N Dec. at 213. Elaborating on the contents of a business plan, the decision states: The plan should contain a market analysis, including the names of competing businesses and their relative strengths and weaknesses, a comparison of the competition’s products and pricing structures, and a description of the target market/prospective customers of the new commercial enterprise.

  2. Mirror Lake Village, Llc et al v. Johnson et al

    MOTION for Summary Judgment

    Filed May 17, 2017

    Case 1:16-cv-01955-TFH Document 18 Filed 05/17/17 Page 11 of 29 5 With this backdrop, investing the requisite capital requires alien entrepreneurs to place funds or other qualifying capital assets “at risk,” which requires undertaking an actual business venture. See Matter of Ho, 22 I. & N. Dec. 206, 210 (Assoc. Comm. 1998); 56 Fed. Reg. 60,902 (INS) (Nov. 29, 1991).

  3. American Logistics International, L.L.C. et al v. Department of Homeland Security et al

    Second MOTION to Dismiss for Lack of Jurisdiction

    Filed July 10, 2017

    In addition to USCIS’s regulations, the former INS designated four agency “EB-5 program precedential decisions” regarding the EB-5 visa classification. See Matter of Izummi, 22 I. & N. Dec. 169 (Assoc. Comm. 1998); Matter of Soffici, 22 I. & N. Dec. 158 (Assoc. Comm. 1998); Matter of Ho, 22 I. & N. Dec. 206 (Assoc. Comm. 1998); Matter of Hsiung, 22 I. & N. Dec. 201 Case 1:15-cv-00682-RDM Document 46 Filed 07/10/17 Page 11 of 24 4 (Assoc. Comm. 1998). These decisions “serve as precedents in all proceedings involving the same issue(s).