§
In re H-A

23 Cited authorities

  1. Mathews v. Eldridge

    424 U.S. 319 (1976)   Cited 16,059 times   43 Legal Analyses
    Holding that federal procedural due process claims are subject to a balancing test, not heightened scrutiny

  2. Stone v. INS

    514 U.S. 386 (1995)   Cited 1,094 times   3 Legal Analyses
    Holding that the IJ's removal order and the Board's denial of a motion to reopen are “two separate final orders”

  3. INS v. Doherty

    502 U.S. 314 (1992)   Cited 1,117 times
    Holding that a regulation with the same formulation established a necessary but not sufficient condition

  4. INS v. Abudu

    485 U.S. 94 (1988)   Cited 1,189 times
    Holding that the BIA may deny a motion to reopen if "the movant has not established a prima facie case for the underlying substantive relief sought"

  5. Armstrong v. Manzo

    380 U.S. 545 (1965)   Cited 2,600 times   3 Legal Analyses
    Holding that failure to give proper notice violates "the rudimentary demands of due process of law"

  6. Bell v. Burson

    402 U.S. 535 (1971)   Cited 1,806 times
    Holding that due process is required for revocation of driver's license

  7. McNary v. Haitian Refugee Center, Inc.

    498 U.S. 479 (1991)   Cited 475 times
    Holding that the INA did not strip jurisdiction over certain claims because otherwise "meaningful judicial review ... would be foreclosed"

  8. Accardi v. Shaughnessy

    347 U.S. 260 (1954)   Cited 891 times
    Holding that Board of Immigration Appeals was required to follow its own regulations in deciding whether to suspend deportation

  9. Immigration & Naturalization Service v. Jong Ha Wang

    450 U.S. 139 (1981)   Cited 299 times
    Holding that where allegations are "unsupported by affidavit" they cannot support a motion to reopen because this would constitute a circumvention of the affidavit requirement in the regulations

  10. INS v. Phinpathya

    464 U.S. 183 (1984)   Cited 248 times
    Holding that thirty-two-year-old statute must still be given its plain meaning

  11. Section 1182 - Inadmissible aliens

    8 U.S.C. § 1182   Cited 9,905 times   69 Legal Analyses
    Holding deportable aliens who have been convicted of "crimes involving moral turpitude"

  12. Section 1229a - Removal proceedings

    8 U.S.C. § 1229a   Cited 6,400 times   8 Legal Analyses
    Granting a noncitizen the right to file one motion to reopen and providing that “the motion to reopen shall be filed within 90 days of the date of entry of a final administrative order of removal”

  13. Section 1255 - Adjustment of status of nonimmigrant to that of person admitted for permanent residence

    8 U.S.C. § 1255   Cited 2,894 times   6 Legal Analyses
    Listing classes of nonimmigrants, such as students and tourists

  14. Section 1154 - Procedure for granting immigrant status

    8 U.S.C. § 1154   Cited 1,162 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Granting immigrant status

  15. Section 1252b - Repealed

    8 U.S.C. § 1252b   Cited 397 times
    Stating that time-and-place information could be provided "in the order to show cause or otherwise"

  16. Section 245.2 - Application

    8 C.F.R. § 245.2   Cited 500 times   3 Legal Analyses
    Granting USCIS authority to adjudicate applications for adjustment of status outside of removal proceedings

  17. Section 204.2 - Petitions for relatives, widows and widowers, and abused spouses and children

    8 C.F.R. § 204.2   Cited 439 times   2 Legal Analyses
    Conferring priority date retention on a derivative beneficiary only "if the subsequent petition is filed by the same petitioner"

  18. Section 103.1 - Reserved

    8 C.F.R. § 103.1   Cited 60 times
    Defining immigration officer to include Border Patrol agents