In re Gallardo

21 Cited authorities

  1. Chevron U.S.A. v. Natural Res. Def. Council

    467 U.S. 837 (1984)   Cited 16,016 times   500 Legal Analyses
    Holding that courts "must give effect to the unambiguously expressed intent of Congress"
  2. National Cable Telecom. Assn. v. Brand X Internet S

    545 U.S. 967 (2005)   Cited 1,172 times   41 Legal Analyses
    Holding that an agency is free within "the limits of reasoned interpretation to change course" only if it "adequately justifies the change"
  3. Fowler v. U.S.

    563 U.S. 668 (2011)   Cited 175 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Holding that, in order to prove a violation of § 1512(C), the government must show a "reasonable likelihood" that a relevant communication would have been made to a federal officer but for the victim's death
  4. U.S. v. Oca

    655 F.3d 915 (9th Cir. 2011)   Cited 159 times   3 Legal Analyses
    Addressing when modified categorical approach applies
  5. U.S. v. Vidal

    504 F.3d 1072 (9th Cir. 2007)   Cited 144 times
    Holding that the complaint in that case "fails to establish the factual predicate for [the defendant's] plea of guilty"
  6. Navarro-Lopez v. Gonzales

    503 F.3d 1063 (9th Cir. 2007)   Cited 118 times
    Holding that a definition of moral turpitude that encompassed all criminal conduct would be overbroad and contrary to the intent of Congress
  7. Denis v. Att'y Gen. U.S.

    633 F.3d 201 (3d Cir. 2011)   Cited 78 times
    Holding that the question "does not present an obscure ambiguity or a matter committed to agency discretion" because Chapter 73 "permit us to easily determine the types of conduct Congress intended the phrase to encompass"
  8. Luu-Le v. INS

    224 F.3d 911 (9th Cir. 2000)   Cited 65 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Holding that conviction for possession of drug paraphernalia under Arizona statute falls within the scope of § 1227(B)
  9. Renteria-Morales v. Mukasey

    551 F.3d 1076 (9th Cir. 2008)   Cited 40 times
    Holding that "the BIA acted reasonably in deriving the definition of ‘obstruction of justice’ for purposes of § 1101 from the body of federal statutes imposing criminal penalties on obstruction-of-justice offenses"
  10. Higgins v. Holder

    677 F.3d 97 (2d Cir. 2012)   Cited 24 times
    Holding that a Connecticut conviction for tampering with witness was an "offense relating to obstruction of justice," because the state conviction required "active interference with proceedings of a tribunal or investigation"
  11. Section 1101 - Definitions

    8 U.S.C. § 1101   Cited 16,343 times   92 Legal Analyses
    Finding notice and comment rulemaking is required for the agency's interim rule recognizing fear of coercive family practices as basis for refugee status
  12. Section 1227 - Deportable aliens

    8 U.S.C. § 1227   Cited 7,882 times   40 Legal Analyses
    Granting this discretion to the Attorney General
  13. Section 1512 - Tampering with a witness, victim, or an informant

    18 U.S.C. § 1512   Cited 4,329 times   41 Legal Analyses
    Defining "law enforcement officer" as "an officer or employee of the Federal Government "
  14. Section 1503 - Influencing or injuring officer or juror generally

    18 U.S.C. § 1503   Cited 2,508 times   17 Legal Analyses
    Relating to obstruction of justice
  15. Section 4 - Misprision of felony

    18 U.S.C. § 4   Cited 1,350 times   10 Legal Analyses
    Subjecting to criminal penalties anyone with "knowledge ... of a felony" and who "conceals" that felony from authorities
  16. Section 3 - Accessory after the fact

    18 U.S.C. § 3   Cited 1,049 times   4 Legal Analyses
    Requiring that the offender act “in order to hinder or prevent [the principal's] apprehension, trial or punishment”
  17. Section 32 - Accessory to felony by harboring, concealing, or aiding principal

    Cal. Pen. Code § 32   Cited 883 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Requiring that the offender act “with the intent that principal may avoid or escape from arrest, trial, conviction or punishment”