§
In re F.S.N.

19 Cited authorities

  1. INS v. Doherty

    502 U.S. 314 (1992)   Cited 1,108 times
    Holding that a regulation with the same formulation established a necessary but not sufficient condition

  2. Paul v. Gonzales

    444 F.3d 148 (2d Cir. 2006)   Cited 2,752 times
    Holding that adverse credibility determination as to claim of past harm does not preclude claim premised on future harm, "so long as the factual predicate of the applicant's claim . . . is independent of the testimony that the IJ found not to be credible"

  3. INS v. Abudu

    485 U.S. 94 (1988)   Cited 1,173 times
    Holding that the BIA may deny a motion to reopen if "the movant has not established a prima facie case for the underlying substantive relief sought"

  4. Hui Lin Huang v. Holder

    677 F.3d 130 (2d Cir. 2012)   Cited 313 times
    Holding the BIA's failure to apply clear-error review is a question of law for which § 1252 provides jurisdiction

  5. Djadjou v. Holder

    662 F.3d 265 (4th Cir. 2011)   Cited 99 times
    Holding that an alien's omission of "her purported leadership role lay at the heart of her claims of past persecution" because she alleged her leadership role was the reason for her persecution

  6. Onyeme v. U.S. Immigration Naturalization

    146 F.3d 227 (4th Cir. 1998)   Cited 93 times
    Holding that IJ did not abuse discretion in refusing to continue removal proceedings to await resolution of pending visa petition because petitioner had not yet applied for adjustment of status and was ineligible for status adjustment absent discretionary relief by Attorney General

  7. Sadhvani v. Holder

    596 F.3d 180 (4th Cir. 2009)   Cited 61 times

    No. 08-1684. Argued: December 1, 2009. Decided: December 31, 2009. ARGUED: Jonathan Ai, Rockville, Maryland, for Petitioner. Paul F. Stone, United States Department of Justice, Washington, DC, for Respondent. ON BRIEF: Joseph Peter Drennan, Alexandria, Virginia; Paul Shearman Allen, Paul Shearman Allen Associates, Washington, DC, for Petitioner. Tony West, Assistant Attorney General, Civil Division, Douglas E. Ginsburg, Senior Litigation Counsel, Office of Immigration Litigation, United States Department

  8. Zhang v. Mukasey

    543 F.3d 851 (6th Cir. 2008)   Cited 62 times
    Holding that the denial of a motion to reopen was not abuse of discretion where petitioner "made no attempt—either before the Board or this court—to rehabilitate her credibility"

  9. Nken v. Holder

    585 F.3d 818 (4th Cir. 2009)   Cited 40 times
    Concluding that BIA order erroneously failed to demonstrate proper consideration of applicant's evidence

  10. Dieng v. Barr

    947 F.3d 956 (6th Cir. 2020)   Cited 18 times
    Upholding denial of motion to reopen where new evidence did not "overcome" determination that petitioner could internally relocate

  11. Section 1158 - Asylum

    8 U.S.C. § 1158   Cited 10,480 times   4 Legal Analyses
    Holding a "pattern or practice" of persecution requires it be "systemic, pervasive, or organized"

  12. Section 1229a - Removal proceedings

    8 U.S.C. § 1229a   Cited 6,321 times   8 Legal Analyses
    Granting a noncitizen the right to file one motion to reopen and providing that “the motion to reopen shall be filed within 90 days of the date of entry of a final administrative order of removal”

  13. Section 1324d - Civil penalties for failure to depart

    8 U.S.C. § 1324d   Cited 15 times
    Providing civil penalties for similar conduct

  14. Section 1003.2 - [Effective 7/29/2024] Reopening or reconsideration before the Board of Immigration Appeals

    8 C.F.R. § 1003.2   Cited 7,785 times   7 Legal Analyses
    Granting power to Board

  15. Section 280.53 - Civil monetary penalties inflation adjustment

    8 C.F.R. § 280.53   1 Legal Analyses

    (a)Statutory authority. In accordance with the requirements of the Federal Civil Penalties Inflation Adjustment Act of 1990, Public Law 101-410 , 104 Stat. 890, as amended by the Federal Civil Penalties Inflation Adjustment Act Improvements Act of 2015, Public Law 114-74 , Sec. 701 , 129 Stat . 599, the civil monetary penalties listed in paragraph (b) of this section are adjusted as provided in paragraph (b). (b)Adjustment of penalties. For violations occurring on or before November 2, 2015, the