ยง
In re E----L----H

3 Cited authorities

  1. INS v. Cardoza-Fonseca

    480 U.S. 421 (1987)   Cited 2,413 times   4 Legal Analyses
    Holding that the phrase "well-founded fear," which is also found in 8 U.S.C. ยง 1101, is ambiguous

  2. INS v. Aguirre-Aguirre

    526 U.S. 415 (1999)   Cited 814 times   2 Legal Analyses
    Holding that the BIA has authority to interpret ambiguous statutes

  3. Zemel v. Rusk

    381 U.S. 1 (1965)   Cited 598 times   2 Legal Analyses
    Holding a First Amendment right was not involved based upon a travel ban which restricted the plaintiffs ability to visit Cuba and collect information, noting "[t]here are few restrictions on action which could not be clothed by ingenious argument in the garb of decreased data flow."