§
In re Dikhtyar

15 Cited authorities

  1. Mathis v. United States

    136 S. Ct. 2243 (2016)   Cited 4,400 times   7 Legal Analyses
    Holding that state-court decisions may inform the question of divisibility

  2. Descamps v. United States

    570 U.S. 254 (2013)   Cited 4,982 times   23 Legal Analyses
    Holding that courts "may look only to the statutory definitions—i.e ., the elements—of a defendant’s prior offenses"

  3. Moncrieffe v. Holder

    569 U.S. 184 (2013)   Cited 1,351 times   15 Legal Analyses
    Holding that sharing marijuana not an aggravated felony

  4. State v. Ashcraft

    2015 UT 5 (Utah 2015)   Cited 44 times
    Holding that the defendant’s constructive possession of the bag was sufficiently supported by other evidence that included testimony that the defendant "repeatedly drove through an area known for drug activity during late night and early morning hours"

  5. State v. Robinson

    2011 UT 30 (Utah 2011)   Cited 18 times
    Explaining that classifications are sustained under rational basis review “if we can reasonably conceive of facts which would justify the distinctions”

  6. Johnson v. Barr

    967 F.3d 1103 (10th Cir. 2020)   Cited 8 times

    No. 19-9550 07-31-2020 Everette Livingston JOHNSON, a/k/a Everette Burns, a/k/a Everette Allen, Petitioner, v. William P. BARR, United States Attorney General, Respondent. Joshua Mitson (Hans Meyer, with him on the briefs), Meyer Law Office P.C., Denver, Colorado, for Petitioner Everett Johnson. Kohsei Ugumori, Senior Litigation Counsel (Joseph H. Hunt, Assistant Attorney General, and Emily Anne Radford, Assistant Director, with him on the brief), Office of Immigration Litigation, Civil Division

  7. State v. Karren

    2018 UT App. 226 (Utah Ct. App. 2018)   Cited 5 times
    Identifying the standard of review for refusal to give a jury instruction as abuse of discretion, but concluding that "the district court did not err" in denying to give the requested jury instruction

  8. Arellano v. Barr

    No. 17-9544 (10th Cir. Aug. 23, 2019)   Cited 3 times

    No. 17-9544 08-23-2019 JUAN DEDIOS ARELLANO, a/k/a Juan De Dios Arellano-Valenzuela, a/k/a Juan De Dios Arellano, Petitioner, v. WILLIAM P. BARR, United States Attorney General, Respondent. Allison H. Eid Circuit Judge (Petition for Review) ORDER AND JUDGMENT Before McHUGH, MORITZ, and EID, Circuit Judges. This order and judgment is not binding precedent, except under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, and collateral estoppel. It may be cited, however, for its persuasive value consistent

  9. State v. Nelson

    2011 UT App. 107 (Utah Ct. App. 2011)   Cited 8 times
    Acknowledging the general presumption that “ ‘a jury will follow the instructions given it,’ ” unless the facts indicate otherwise (quoting State v. Menzies, 889 P.2d 393, 401 (Utah 1994))

  10. State v. Martinez-Castellanos

    2019 UT App. 50 (Utah Ct. App. 2019)

    No. 20130432-CA 04-04-2019 STATE of Utah, Appellee, v. Abisai MARTINEZ-CASTELLANOS, Appellant. APPLEBY, Judge Opinion :¶1 This case is on remand from the Utah Supreme Court. Abisai Martinez-Castellanos was convicted of two counts of possession of or use of a controlled substance, one count of possession of drug paraphernalia, and one count of driving with a controlled substance in the body after a Utah Highway Patrol trooper (Officer) found drugs and drug paraphernalia in his car during a traffic

  11. Section 1182 - Inadmissible aliens

    8 U.S.C. § 1182   Cited 9,779 times   67 Legal Analyses
    Holding deportable aliens who have been convicted of "crimes involving moral turpitude"

  12. Section 1227 - Deportable aliens

    8 U.S.C. § 1227   Cited 7,931 times   40 Legal Analyses
    Granting this discretion to the Attorney General

  13. Section 812 - Schedules of controlled substances

    21 U.S.C. § 812   Cited 2,829 times   76 Legal Analyses
    Criminalizing heroin

  14. Section 58-37-8 - Prohibited acts - Penalties

    Utah Code § 58-37-8   Cited 416 times   2 Legal Analyses
    Arranging to distribute a controlled substance

  15. Section 58-37-4 - Schedules of controlled substances - Schedules I through V - Findings required - Specific substances included in schedules

    Utah Code § 58-37-4   Cited 12 times

    (1) There are established five schedules of controlled substances known as Schedules I, II, III, IV, and V which consist of substances listed in this section. (2) Schedules I, II, III, IV, and V consist of the following drugs or other substances by the official name, common or usual name, chemical name, or brand name designated: (a) Schedule I: (i) Unless specifically excepted or unless listed in another schedule, any of the following opiates, including their isomers, esters, ethers, salts, and salts