In re D. Rodriguez

39 Cited authorities

  1. Chevron U.S.A. v. Natural Res. Def. Council

    467 U.S. 837 (1984)   Cited 16,303 times   628 Legal Analyses
    Holding that courts "must give effect to the unambiguously expressed intent of Congress"
  2. Almendarez-Torres v. United States

    523 U.S. 224 (1998)   Cited 6,641 times   21 Legal Analyses
    Holding that the fact of a prior conviction is not an element of an offense even when it increases a defendant's statutory maximum term of imprisonment
  3. Clay v. U.S.

    537 U.S. 522 (2003)   Cited 4,656 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Holding that in the § 2255 context, "a judgment of conviction becomes final when the time expires for filing a petition for certiorari contesting the appellate court’s affirmation of the conviction"
  4. Johnson v. U.S.

    559 U.S. 133 (2010)   Cited 2,801 times   14 Legal Analyses
    Holding that 18 U.S.C. § 924(e) ’s nearly identical "physical force" clause "means violent force—that is, force capable of causing physical pain or injury to another person"
  5. Connecticut Nat. Bank v. Germain

    503 U.S. 249 (1992)   Cited 2,769 times   8 Legal Analyses
    Holding that § 1292 applies also to bankruptcy jurisdiction and is not displaced by § 158(d)
  6. Rummel v. Estelle

    445 U.S. 263 (1980)   Cited 2,715 times   3 Legal Analyses
    Holding that Texas's recidivist statute did not violate the Eighth Amendment and declining to engage in "extensive intrusion into the basic line-drawing process that is pre-eminently the province of the legislature when it makes an act criminal"
  7. Russello v. United States

    464 U.S. 16 (1983)   Cited 2,147 times   6 Legal Analyses
    Holding that where "Congress includes particular language in one section of a statute but omits it in another section of the same Act," courts presume that "Congress acts intentionally and purposely in the disparate inclusion or exclusion"
  8. Loper Bright Enters. v. Raimondo, Sec'y of Commerce

    144 S. Ct. 2244 (2024)   Cited 447 times   37 Legal Analyses
    Holding that a court "may not defer to an agency interpretation of the law simply because a statute is ambiguous"
  9. Young v. United States

    535 U.S. 43 (2002)   Cited 430 times
    Holding that three-year lookback period applicable to tax claims in bankruptcy is subject to equitable tolling
  10. Barnhart v. Peabody Coal Co.

    537 U.S. 149 (2003)   Cited 383 times   4 Legal Analyses
    Holding that the Government's untimeliness did not bar it from taking action beyond the statutory deadline
  11. Section 1101 - Definitions

    8 U.S.C. § 1101   Cited 16,892 times   92 Legal Analyses
    Finding notice and comment rulemaking is required for the agency's interim rule recognizing fear of coercive family practices as basis for refugee status
  12. Section 1227 - Deportable aliens

    8 U.S.C. § 1227   Cited 8,091 times   42 Legal Analyses
    Granting this discretion to the Attorney General
  13. Section 1229b - Cancellation of removal; adjustment of status

    8 U.S.C. § 1229b   Cited 5,246 times   24 Legal Analyses
    Granting the Attorney General discretion to cancel the removal of an alien who has “been battered or subjected to extreme cruelty by a ... parent who is ... a United States citizen”
  14. Section 1251 - Transferred

    8 U.S.C. § 1251   Cited 2,160 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Delineating crimes that make alien deportable
  15. Section 1963 - Criminal penalties

    18 U.S.C. § 1963   Cited 1,369 times   8 Legal Analyses
    Permitting substitution where property forfeitable under § 1963 has been dissipated
  16. Section 22.04 - Injury to A Child, Elderly Individual, or Disabled Individual

    Tex. Pen. Code § 22.04   Cited 1,299 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Requiring proof, in a first-degree-felony prosecution for injury to a child, of a culpable mental state with respect to the element of "serious bodily injury"
  17. Section 15.01 - Criminal Attempt

    Tex. Pen. Code § 15.01   Cited 756 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Defining criminal attempt
  18. Section 204 - Codes and Supplements as evidence of the laws of United States and District of Columbia; citation of Codes and Supplements

    1 U.S.C. § 204   Cited 89 times   1 Legal Analyses

    In all courts, tribunals, and public offices of the United States, at home or abroad, of the District of Columbia, and of each State, Territory, or insular possession of the United States- (a) United States Code.-The matter set forth in the edition of the Code of Laws of the United States current at any time shall, together with the then current supplement, if any, establish prima facie the laws of the United States, general and permanent in their nature, in force on the day preceding the commencement