§

In re Cervantes-Gonzalez

22 I&N Dec. 560 (B.I.A. 1999)
In re Cervantes-Gonzalez

77 Cited authorities

  1. Lindh v. Murphy

    521 U.S. 320 (1997)   Cited 11,078 times   29 Legal Analyses
    Holding that the statutory language must be "so clear that it [can] sustain only one interpretation" favoring retroactivity

  2. Leatherman v. Tarrant County Narcotics Intelligence & Coordination Unit

    507 U.S. 163 (1993)   Cited 5,133 times   2 Legal Analyses
    Holding that there is no heightened pleading requirement in § 1983 suits against municipalities

  3. Landgraf v. USI Film Prods.

    511 U.S. 244 (1994)   Cited 3,812 times   32 Legal Analyses
    Holding that a statute may apply retroactively when "clear congressional intent favor such a result"

  4. Bowen v. Georgetown University Hospital

    488 U.S. 204 (1988)   Cited 1,722 times   10 Legal Analyses
    Holding that courts will not defer to an agency's litigating position where it contradicts the agency's prior “regulations, rulings, or administrative practice”

  5. Universal Camera Corp. v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.

    340 U.S. 474 (1951)   Cited 9,575 times   3 Legal Analyses
    Holding that court may not "displace the Board's choice between two fairly conflicting views, even though the court would justifiably have made a different choice had the matter been before it de novo "

  6. Custis v. United States

    511 U.S. 485 (1994)   Cited 1,281 times   5 Legal Analyses
    Holding that defendant may not collaterally attack prior conviction used to enhance sentence under the Armed Career Criminal Act because the statute does not explicitly permit such challenges

  7. Touche Ross Co. v. Redington

    442 U.S. 560 (1979)   Cited 1,722 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Holding that the "central inquiry remains whether Congress intended to create, whether expressly or by implication, a private cause of action."

  8. Lynce v. Mathis

    519 U.S. 433 (1997)   Cited 837 times   2 Legal Analyses
    Holding the cancellation of early release credits violated the Ex Post Facto Clause

  9. Kaiser Aluminum Chemical Corp. v. Bonjorno

    494 U.S. 827 (1990)   Cited 859 times   2 Legal Analyses
    Holding that the "plain language" of the newly enacted federal post-judgment interest statute, 28 U.S.C. § 1961, which requires that interest "`be calculated from the date of the entry of the judgment,'" "evidences clear congressional intent that [the provision] is not applicable to judgments entered before its effective date."

  10. Hughes Aircraft v. U.S. ex Rel. Schumer

    520 U.S. 939 (1997)   Cited 533 times   6 Legal Analyses
    Holding that the presumption against retroactivity must apply “unless Congress has clearly manifested its intent to the contrary”

  11. Section 1182 - Inadmissible aliens

    8 U.S.C. § 1182   Cited 9,770 times   67 Legal Analyses
    Holding deportable aliens who have been convicted of "crimes involving moral turpitude"

  12. Section 1028 - Fraud and related activity in connection with identification documents, authentication features, and information

    18 U.S.C. § 1028   Cited 2,119 times   12 Legal Analyses
    Defining "identification document"

  13. Section 1254 - Repealed

    8 U.S.C. § 1254   Cited 1,130 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Describing suspension-of-deportation eligibility

  14. Section 1324c - Penalties for document fraud

    8 U.S.C. § 1324c   Cited 131 times
    Criminalizing the failure to disclose that a person received a "fee or other remuneration" for assisting with false applications for immigration benefits

  15. Section 1185 - Travel control of citizens and aliens

    8 U.S.C. § 1185   Cited 101 times
    Requiring U.S. citizens to present proper identification to enter the United States