In re Castro-Tum

76 Cited authorities

  1. Williams v. Taylor

    529 U.S. 362 (2000)   Cited 37,732 times   66 Legal Analyses
    Holding that counsel's performance was deficient when their investigation failed to uncover "extensive records" filled with mitigation evidence concerning the defendant's family history, education, mental health, and rehabilitation
  2. Chambers v. Nasco, Inc.

    501 U.S. 32 (1991)   Cited 9,178 times   14 Legal Analyses
    Holding that courts "may bar from the courtroom a criminal defendant who disrupts a trial" may "assess attorney fees when a party has acted in bad faith, vexatiously, wantonly, or for oppressive reasons," and "may act sua sponte to dismiss a suit for failure to prosecute"
  3. National Cable Telecom. Assn. v. Brand X Internet S

    545 U.S. 967 (2005)   Cited 1,171 times   41 Legal Analyses
    Holding that an agency is free within "the limits of reasoned interpretation to change course" only if it "adequately justifies the change"
  4. Stone v. INS

    514 U.S. 386 (1995)   Cited 1,075 times   3 Legal Analyses
    Holding that the IJ's removal order and the Board's denial of a motion to reopen are “two separate final orders”
  5. Gustafson v. Alloyd Co.

    513 U.S. 561 (1995)   Cited 995 times   10 Legal Analyses
    Holding that § 12 does not apply to secondary market transactions as the statute's inclusion of the term “prospectus” evinces an intent to limit the Sections's scope solely to the initial public offering
  6. INS v. Doherty

    502 U.S. 314 (1992)   Cited 1,107 times
    Holding that a regulation with the same formulation established a necessary but not sufficient condition
  7. Yates v. United States

    574 U.S. 528 (2015)   Cited 478 times   7 Legal Analyses
    Holding that, in light of a statute's illustrative list, "tangible object" covers "only objects one can use to record or preserve information, not all objects in the physical world"
  8. INS v. Abudu

    485 U.S. 94 (1988)   Cited 1,170 times
    Holding that the BIA may deny a motion to reopen if "the movant has not established a prima facie case for the underlying substantive relief sought"
  9. Securities Comm'n v. Chenery Corp.

    332 U.S. 194 (1947)   Cited 4,140 times   14 Legal Analyses
    Holding that reviewing court may consider only grounds invoked by agency
  10. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Bell Aerospace Co.

    416 U.S. 267 (1974)   Cited 751 times   8 Legal Analyses
    Holding that an agency is "not precluded from announcing new principles in an adjudicative proceeding"
  11. Section 1229a - Removal proceedings

    8 U.S.C. § 1229a   Cited 6,270 times   8 Legal Analyses
    Granting a noncitizen the right to file one motion to reopen and providing that “the motion to reopen shall be filed within 90 days of the date of entry of a final administrative order of removal”
  12. Section 1229 - Initiation of removal proceedings

    8 U.S.C. § 1229   Cited 1,340 times   5 Legal Analyses
    Authorizing service by mail
  13. Section 1252b - Repealed

    8 U.S.C. § 1252b   Cited 393 times
    Stating that time-and-place information could be provided "in the order to show cause or otherwise"
  14. Section 1232 - Enhancing efforts to combat the trafficking of children

    8 U.S.C. § 1232   Cited 160 times
    Adopting the definition of UAC in Title 6
  15. Section 279 - Children's affairs

    6 U.S.C. § 279   Cited 104 times
    Defining an "unaccompanied alien child" as someone who "has not attained 18 years of age"
  16. Section 1003.1 - Organization, jurisdiction, and powers of the Board of Immigration Appeals

    8 C.F.R. § 1003.1   Cited 1,124 times
    Authorizing " single Board member or panel [to] summarily dismiss any appeal or portion of any appeal" on that ground
  17. Section 1003.29 - Continuances

    8 C.F.R. § 1003.29   Cited 653 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Authorizing continuances
  18. Section 1003.14 - Jurisdiction and commencement of proceedings

    8 C.F.R. § 1003.14   Cited 482 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Recognizing that removal proceedings commence "when a charging document is filed with the Immigration court"
  19. Section 1240.1 - Immigration judges

    8 C.F.R. § 1240.1   Cited 165 times
    Granting immigration judge in removal proceeding authority to determine applications for adjustment of status
  20. Section 212.7 - Waiver of certain grounds of inadmissibility

    8 C.F.R. § 212.7   Cited 142 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Establishing that a person may be eligible for a provisional waiver if "[u]pon departure, [he] would be inadmissible only under(B) ... at the time of the immigrant visa interview"
  21. Section 1003.10 - Immigration judges

    8 C.F.R. § 1003.10   Cited 82 times
    Authorizing Director to "designate . . . temporary immigration judges for renewable terms not to exceed six months"
  22. Section 1003.26 - In absentia hearings

    8 C.F.R. § 1003.26   Cited 43 times
    Requiring DHS to establish that written notice of the time and place of proceedings, as well as the consequences of failure to appear, was provided to the alien
  23. Section 103.8 - Service of decisions and other notices

    8 C.F.R. § 103.8   Cited 40 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Requiring service on someone other than minor only if minor is younger than fourteen
  24. Section 1240.6 - Postponement and adjournment of hearing

    8 C.F.R. § 1240.6   Cited 16 times
    Authorizing adjournments
  25. Section 1236.3 - Detention and release of juveniles

    8 C.F.R. § 1236.3   Cited 14 times

    (a)Juveniles. A juvenile is defined as an alien under the age of 18 years. (b)Release. Juveniles for whom bond has been posted, for whom parole has been authorized, or who have been ordered released on recognizance, shall be released pursuant to the following guidelines: (1) Juveniles shall be released, in order of preference, to: (i) A parent; (ii) Legal guardian; or (iii) An adult relative (brother, sister, aunt, uncle, grandparent) who is not presently in Service detention, unless a determination