§
In re C-C-I

21 Cited authorities

  1. Judulang v. Holder

    565 U.S. 42 (2011)   Cited 381 times   7 Legal Analyses
    Holding that an irrational application of a statute is arbitrary and capricious

  2. Ruiz v. U.S. Attorney General

    440 F.3d 1247 (11th Cir. 2006)   Cited 556 times
    Holding that this Court will affirm the BIA's decision "if it is supported by reasonable, substantial, and probative evidence on the record considered as a whole"

  3. Forgue v. U.S. Attorney General

    401 F.3d 1282 (11th Cir. 2005)   Cited 568 times
    Holding that because the applicant "failed to establish a claim of asylum on the merits, he necessarily fails to establish eligibility for withholding of removal or protection under CAT"

  4. Chen v. U.S. Attorney General

    463 F.3d 1228 (11th Cir. 2006)   Cited 278 times
    Holding that even if an asylum applicant offers tenable explanations for record- inconsistencies, those explanations do not compel reversal of the immigration judge's adverse credibility determination

  5. Ali v. Mukasey

    529 F.3d 478 (2d Cir. 2008)   Cited 233 times
    Holding that the law of the case should not be overturned "absent 'cogent' and 'compelling' reasons such as 'an intervening change of controlling law, the availability of new evidence, or the need to correct a clear error or prevent manifest injustice'" (quoting United States v. Tenzer, 213 F.3d 34, 39 (2d Cir. 2000))

  6. Ezeagwuna v. Ashcroft

    325 F.3d 396 (3d Cir. 2003)   Cited 164 times
    Holding that a letter prepared by a U.S. embassy official in Yaounde contained “multiple hearsay of the most troubling kind” and, therefore, was “neither reliable nor trustworthy”

  7. Oyeniran v. Holder

    672 F.3d 800 (9th Cir. 2012)   Cited 122 times
    Holding that collateral estoppel applies in the context of immigration proceedings

  8. Khouzam v. Attorney General of the United States

    549 F.3d 235 (3d Cir. 2008)   Cited 88 times
    Holding that 8 U.S.C. § 1252(b) is a non-jurisdictional venue provision

  9. Zhou Hua Zhu v. U.S. Attorney Gen.

    703 F.3d 1303 (11th Cir. 2013)   Cited 71 times
    Holding that an IJ's determination of the likelihood of a future event is a factfinding

  10. Mohammed v. U.S. Attorney General

    547 F.3d 1340 (11th Cir. 2008)   Cited 76 times
    Holding that substantial evidence supported the finding that the alien failed to establish past persecution based on incredible testimony and unreliable corroborative evidence

  11. Rule 401 - Test for Relevant Evidence

    Fed. R. Evid. 401   Cited 14,184 times   36 Legal Analyses
    Stating that evidence is relevant if it has "any tendency to make a fact more or less probable than it would be without the evidence" and "the fact is of consequence in determining the action"

  12. Section 1182 - Inadmissible aliens

    8 U.S.C. § 1182   Cited 10,030 times   80 Legal Analyses
    Holding deportable aliens who have been convicted of "crimes involving moral turpitude"

  13. Section 1003.2 - Reopening or reconsideration before the Board of Immigration Appeals

    8 C.F.R. § 1003.2   Cited 7,863 times   7 Legal Analyses
    Granting power to Board

  14. Section 1208.17 - Deferral of removal under the Convention Against Torture

    8 C.F.R. § 1208.17   Cited 402 times
    Stating that for an alien to be eligible for deferral of removal under the CAT, they must "ha[ve] been found under § 1208.16(c) to be entitled to protection under the Convention Against Torture"

  15. Section 1212.3 - Application for the exercise of discretion under former section 212(c)

    8 C.F.R. § 1212.3   Cited 134 times   2 Legal Analyses
    Providing that LPRs who pled guilty to certain crimes before April 1, 1997 can apply for relief under former section 212(c) during the pendency of their removal proceedings