§
In re Beckford

35 Cited authorities

  1. Lindh v. Murphy

    521 U.S. 320 (1997)   Cited 11,222 times   29 Legal Analyses
    Holding that the statutory language must be "so clear that it [can] sustain only one interpretation" favoring retroactivity

  2. Landgraf v. USI Film Prods.

    511 U.S. 244 (1994)   Cited 3,892 times   34 Legal Analyses
    Holding that a statute may apply retroactively when "clear congressional intent favor such a result"

  3. Taylor v. Illinois

    484 U.S. 400 (1988)   Cited 2,339 times   9 Legal Analyses
    Holding that the trial court's exclusion of a witness whose name was untimely disclosed to the government didn't violate the defendant's right to a complete defense

  4. INS v. Cardoza-Fonseca

    480 U.S. 421 (1987)   Cited 2,414 times   4 Legal Analyses
    Holding that the phrase "well-founded fear," which is also found in 8 U.S.C. § 1101, is ambiguous

  5. Russello v. United States

    464 U.S. 16 (1983)   Cited 2,139 times   6 Legal Analyses
    Holding that where "Congress includes particular language in one section of a statute but omits it in another section of the same Act," courts presume that "Congress acts intentionally and purposely in the disparate inclusion or exclusion"

  6. INS v. Doherty

    502 U.S. 314 (1992)   Cited 1,118 times
    Holding that a regulation with the same formulation established a necessary but not sufficient condition

  7. INS v. Abudu

    485 U.S. 94 (1988)   Cited 1,191 times
    Holding that the BIA may deny a motion to reopen if "the movant has not established a prima facie case for the underlying substantive relief sought"

  8. Hughes Aircraft v. U.S. ex Rel. Schumer

    520 U.S. 939 (1997)   Cited 540 times   6 Legal Analyses
    Holding that the presumption against retroactivity must apply “unless Congress has clearly manifested its intent to the contrary”

  9. Landon v. Plasencia

    459 U.S. 21 (1982)   Cited 624 times   3 Legal Analyses
    Holding that such aliens are entitled to protections of Due Process Clause in exclusion proceedings

  10. Henderson v. I.N.S.

    157 F.3d 106 (2d Cir. 1998)   Cited 457 times
    Holding that a court has personal jurisdiction in a § 2241 habeas case "`so long as the custodian can be reached by service of process'" as governed by state law

  11. Section 1101 - Definitions

    8 U.S.C. § 1101   Cited 16,833 times   91 Legal Analyses
    Finding notice and comment rulemaking is required for the agency's interim rule recognizing fear of coercive family practices as basis for refugee status

  12. Section 1182 - Inadmissible aliens

    8 U.S.C. § 1182   Cited 9,977 times   73 Legal Analyses
    Holding deportable aliens who have been convicted of "crimes involving moral turpitude"

  13. Section 1227 - Deportable aliens

    8 U.S.C. § 1227   Cited 8,075 times   42 Legal Analyses
    Granting this discretion to the Attorney General

  14. Section 1229a - Removal proceedings

    8 U.S.C. § 1229a   Cited 6,462 times   8 Legal Analyses
    Granting a noncitizen the right to file one motion to reopen and providing that “the motion to reopen shall be filed within 90 days of the date of entry of a final administrative order of removal”

  15. Section 1103 - Powers and duties of the Secretary, the Under Secretary, and the Attorney General

    8 U.S.C. § 1103   Cited 852 times   4 Legal Analyses
    Granting the Attorney General power to "establish such regulations" and "review . . . administrative determinations in immigration proceedings"

  16. Section 21a-277 - (Formerly Sec. 19-480). Penalty for illegal manufacture, distribution, sale, prescription, dispensing

    Conn. Gen. Stat. § 21a-277   Cited 168 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Providing that anyone who violates the provision "shall be imprisoned not more than fifteen years"