In re Bahta

76 Cited authorities

  1. Chevron U.S.A. v. Natural Res. Def. Council

    467 U.S. 837 (1984)   Cited 16,211 times   616 Legal Analyses
    Holding that courts "must give effect to the unambiguously expressed intent of Congress"
  2. Taylor v. United States

    495 U.S. 575 (1990)   Cited 5,284 times   27 Legal Analyses
    Holding that the term "burglary" as used in the Armed Career Criminal Act was to be given its "generic, contemporary meaning" to avoid a scenario in which "a person ... would, or would not, receive a sentence enhancement based on exactly the same conduct, depending on whether the State of his prior conviction happened to call that conduct ‘burglary’ "
  3. United States v. Ron Pair Enterprises, Inc.

    489 U.S. 235 (1989)   Cited 4,606 times   16 Legal Analyses
    Holding that where Congress expresses its intent "with sufficient precision," then "reference to legislative history and to pre-Code practice is hardly necessary"
  4. INS v. Cardoza-Fonseca

    480 U.S. 421 (1987)   Cited 2,410 times   4 Legal Analyses
    Holding that the phrase "well-founded fear," which is also found in 8 U.S.C. § 1101, is ambiguous
  5. Reno v. American-Arab Anti-Discrimination Com

    525 U.S. 471 (1999)   Cited 1,089 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Holding that "an alien unlawfully in this country has no constitutional right to assert selective enforcement as a defense against his deportation"
  6. Schmuck v. United States

    489 U.S. 705 (1989)   Cited 1,168 times   6 Legal Analyses
    Holding that "routine" mailings that occurred "after the fraud [had] come to fruition" were part of the execution of the defendant's fraudulent scheme because the fraud was not a "'one-shot' operation," but an "ongoing fraudulent venture"
  7. Tennessee Valley Authority v. Hill

    437 U.S. 153 (1978)   Cited 1,524 times   7 Legal Analyses
    Holding that budget appropriations cannot alter meaning of statute
  8. Griffin v. Oceanic Contractors, Inc.

    458 U.S. 564 (1982)   Cited 1,272 times   2 Legal Analyses
    Holding that a court has no discretion in the assessment of the double-wage penalty
  9. K Mart Corp. v. Cartier, Inc.

    486 U.S. 281 (1988)   Cited 806 times   6 Legal Analyses
    Holding a C.F.R. provision invalid because it conflicted with the unequivocal language of the statute
  10. Aaron v. Securities & Exchange Commission

    446 U.S. 680 (1980)   Cited 788 times   27 Legal Analyses
    Holding that scienter is an element of Section 10(b), Rule 10b-5, and Section 17, but not Section 17 or
  11. Section 1252 - Judicial review of orders of removal

    8 U.S.C. § 1252   Cited 43,251 times   37 Legal Analyses
    Holding court had no jurisdiction to review "any judgment regarding the granting of relief under section . . . 1229b"
  12. Section 1101 - Definitions

    8 U.S.C. § 1101   Cited 16,705 times   91 Legal Analyses
    Finding notice and comment rulemaking is required for the agency's interim rule recognizing fear of coercive family practices as basis for refugee status
  13. Section 1227 - Deportable aliens

    8 U.S.C. § 1227   Cited 8,031 times   41 Legal Analyses
    Granting this discretion to the Attorney General
  14. Section 1229a - Removal proceedings

    8 U.S.C. § 1229a   Cited 6,400 times   8 Legal Analyses
    Granting a noncitizen the right to file one motion to reopen and providing that “the motion to reopen shall be filed within 90 days of the date of entry of a final administrative order of removal”
  15. Section 641 - Public money, property or records

    18 U.S.C. § 641   Cited 2,994 times   22 Legal Analyses
    Requiring knowledge
  16. Section 2315 - Sale or receipt of stolen goods, securities, moneys, or fraudulent State tax stamps

    18 U.S.C. § 2315   Cited 618 times   2 Legal Analyses
    Forbidding the possession, receipt, or sale of of stolen property that has crossed state borders
  17. Section 2313 - Sale or receipt of stolen vehicles

    18 U.S.C. § 2313   Cited 529 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Possessing a stolen motor vehicle that had been transported across state lines
  18. Section 165.40 - Criminal possession of stolen property in the fifth degree

    N.Y. Penal Law § 165.40   Cited 435 times

    A person is guilty of criminal possession of stolen property in the fifth degree when he knowingly possesses stolen property, with intent to benefit himself or a person other than an owner thereof or to impede the recovery by an owner thereof. Criminal possession of stolen property in the fifth degree is a class A misdemeanor. N.Y. Penal Law § 165.40

  19. Section 165.45 - Criminal possession of stolen property in the fourth degree

    N.Y. Penal Law § 165.45   Cited 433 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Finding a person guilty of fourth degree criminal possession of stolen property when he or she "knowingly possess stolen property, with the intent to benefit himself or [another] . . . other than owner thereof or to impede recovery by the owner, and when: . . . [t]he property consists of one or more firearms . . . ."
  20. Section 193.330 - Punishment for attempts [Replaced]

    Nev. Rev. Stat. § 193.330   Cited 349 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Defining attempt