§
In re B-Z-R

14 Cited authorities

  1. Delgado v. Eric H. Holder Jr.

    648 F.3d 1095 (9th Cir. 2011)   Cited 113 times
    Holding that § 1158(b)(B) "does not require the Attorney General to anticipate every adjudication by promulgating a regulation covering each particular crime"

  2. Alphonsus v. Holder

    705 F.3d 1031 (9th Cir. 2013)   Cited 105 times
    Holding that the Board must provide reasons for treating factually identical cases differently

  3. Denis v. Att'y Gen. U.S.

    633 F.3d 201 (3d Cir. 2011)   Cited 78 times
    Holding that the question "does not present an obscure ambiguity or a matter committed to agency discretion" because Chapter 73 "permit us to easily determine the types of conduct Congress intended the phrase to encompass"

  4. Gomez-Sanchez v. Sessions

    887 F.3d 893 (9th Cir. 2018)   Cited 45 times
    Holding that the Board of Immigration Appeals acted arbitrarily and capriciously by "constrain[ing] the evidence that [judges] may consider when making a particularly serious crime determination" when it had previously held that reliable evidence should not be excluded

  5. N-A-M v. Holder

    587 F.3d 1052 (10th Cir. 2009)   Cited 28 times
    Holding that "Congress's use of two different terms—‘particularly serious’ crime and ‘aggravated’ felony—is additionally indicative of substantively different meanings"

  6. Birhanu v. Wilkinson

    990 F.3d 1242 (10th Cir. 2021)   Cited 10 times
    Holding that noncitizen's two citations to a statute, "without specifically explaining why [the statute] entitles him to relief, did not fairly present his legal theory to the BIA"

  7. Shazi v. Wilkinson

    988 F.3d 441 (8th Cir. 2021)   Cited 9 times
    Rejecting a categorical bar to considering mental health evidence in particularly serious crime inquiry

  8. Zhan Gao v. Holder

    595 F.3d 549 (4th Cir. 2010)   Cited 14 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Rejecting the view that "regulation is the exclusive means by which the Attorney General can determine that a non-aggravated felony is a particularly serious crime" because, among other things, "requiring an agency to proceed by rulemaking alone could stultify the administrative process by rendering it inflexible and incapable of dealing with many of the specialized problems which arise"

  9. Section 1158 - Asylum

    8 U.S.C. § 1158   Cited 10,479 times   4 Legal Analyses
    Holding a "pattern or practice" of persecution requires it be "systemic, pervasive, or organized"

  10. Section 1231 - Detention and removal of aliens ordered removed

    8 U.S.C. § 1231   Cited 7,830 times   13 Legal Analyses
    Concluding that once petitioner's removal order was reinstated, he was no longer eligible for "relief" in the form of adjustment of status-even if he could obtain a Form I-212 waiver

  11. Section 2C:18-2 - Burglary

    N.J. Stat. § 2C:18-2   Cited 998 times
    Requiring intent to commit an offense while entering a structure to prove burglary

  12. Section 1003.1 - [Effective until 7/29/2024] Organization, jurisdiction, and powers of the Board of Immigration Appeals

    8 C.F.R. § 1003.1   Cited 1,142 times
    Requiring BIA to follow its own precedent

  13. Section 1208.16 - Withholding of removal under section 241(b)(3)(B) of the Act and withholding of removal under the Convention Against Torture

    8 C.F.R. § 1208.16   Cited 822 times
    Withholding of removal

  14. Section 1208.17 - Deferral of removal under the Convention Against Torture

    8 C.F.R. § 1208.17   Cited 386 times
    Stating that for an alien to be eligible for deferral of removal under the CAT, they must "ha[ve] been found under § 1208.16(c) to be entitled to protection under the Convention Against Torture"