§
In re B-B

8 Cited authorities

  1. INS v. Doherty

    502 U.S. 314 (1992)   Cited 1,107 times
    Holding that a regulation with the same formulation established a necessary but not sufficient condition

  2. Lozada v. I.N.S.

    857 F.2d 10 (1st Cir. 1988)   Cited 159 times
    Holding that the Sixth Amendment does not apply to deportation proceedings because they are considered civil in nature

  3. Magallanes-Damian v. I.N.S.

    783 F.2d 931 (9th Cir. 1986)   Cited 106 times
    Holding that an attorney's decision not to contest deportability was an appropriate tactical decision

  4. Shaar v. Immigration and Naturalization Ser

    141 F.3d 953 (9th Cir. 1998)   Cited 62 times
    Holding pre-IIRIRA version of § 1229c(d), § 1252b(e), prohibits an alien who has remained in the United States after the scheduled departure date from applying for adjustment of status, even if the alien sought reopening before departure date

  5. Leblanc v. I.N.S.

    715 F.2d 685 (1st Cir. 1983)   Cited 31 times
    Finding no need to remand where Board "clearly made a discretionary decision"

  6. Mohsseni Behbahani v. I.N.S.

    796 F.2d 249 (9th Cir. 1986)   Cited 24 times
    Concluding that the petitioner's failure to "describe the evidence that [his counsel] incompetently failed to introduce" prevented the court from finding prejudice

  7. Section 1158 - Asylum

    8 U.S.C. § 1158   Cited 10,437 times   4 Legal Analyses
    Holding a "pattern or practice" of persecution requires it be "systemic, pervasive, or organized"

  8. Section 292.3 - Professional conduct for practitioners-Rules and procedures

    8 C.F.R. § 292.3   Cited 15 times
    Providing for sanctions against "a practitioner who is authorized to practice before DHS"