§
In re B-A-S

12 Cited authorities

  1. Lindh v. Murphy

    521 U.S. 320 (1997)   Cited 11,077 times   29 Legal Analyses
    Holding that the statutory language must be "so clear that it [can] sustain only one interpretation" favoring retroactivity

  2. K Mart Corp. v. Cartier, Inc.

    486 U.S. 281 (1988)   Cited 794 times   6 Legal Analyses
    Holding a C.F.R. provision invalid because it conflicted with the unequivocal language of the statute

  3. Ungar v. Sarafite

    376 U.S. 575 (1964)   Cited 1,910 times   2 Legal Analyses
    Holding that court committed no constitutional violation in denying one-week continuance request for counsel to prepare because, in part, the defendant (who was a lawyer) sought relief on "the day of the scheduled hearing" and was "familiar with the court's practice of not granting adjournments"

  4. Coit Independence Joint Venture v. Federal Savings & Loan Insurance

    489 U.S. 561 (1989)   Cited 265 times
    Holding that creditors were not required to exhaust the Federal Home Loan Bank Board's administrative claims procedure before bringing suit against a federal bank

  5. Rashtabadi v. I.N.S.

    23 F.3d 1562 (9th Cir. 1994)   Cited 159 times
    Holding that grand theft is a crime involving moral turpitude

  6. Castillo-Villagra v. I.N.S.

    972 F.2d 1017 (9th Cir. 1992)   Cited 135 times
    Holding that a subsequent statute must "expressly" modify the APA

  7. Arrieta v. I.N.S.

    117 F.3d 429 (9th Cir. 1997)   Cited 88 times
    Holding that "notice by certified mail sent to an alien's last known address can be sufficient under the Act, even if no one signed for it."

  8. Montes v. Thornburgh

    919 F.2d 531 (9th Cir. 1990)   Cited 75 times
    Finding § 1105a inapplicable to suits alleging a pattern and practice of constitutional violations

  9. Urbina-Osejo v. I.N.S.

    124 F.3d 1314 (9th Cir. 1997)   Cited 34 times
    Holding that "there is reasonable cause for a failure to appear when an alien has not received notice of the time and place of the hearing due to a change of address, and the alien was not informed of a requirement to advise the INS of any change of address."

  10. De Morales v. Immigration & Naturalization Service

    116 F.3d 145 (5th Cir. 1997)   Cited 27 times
    Holding “that the mechanical failure of the petitioners' car on the way to the hearing did not constitute exceptional circumstances” where petitioners returned home instead of finding transportation to the hearing and made only a cursory effort to contact the court

  11. Section 1252b - Repealed

    8 U.S.C. § 1252b   Cited 395 times
    Stating that time-and-place information could be provided "in the order to show cause or otherwise"