In re Alfaro

23 Cited authorities

  1. Chevron U.S.A. v. Natural Res. Def. Council

    467 U.S. 837 (1984)   Cited 16,211 times   616 Legal Analyses
    Holding that courts "must give effect to the unambiguously expressed intent of Congress"
  2. National Cable Telecom. Assn. v. Brand X Internet S

    545 U.S. 967 (2005)   Cited 1,188 times   47 Legal Analyses
    Holding that an agency is free within "the limits of reasoned interpretation to change course" only if it "adequately justifies the change"
  3. Marmolejo-Campos v. Holder

    558 F.3d 903 (9th Cir. 2009)   Cited 189 times   2 Legal Analyses
    Holding that Chevron deference applies to published decisions but Skidmore deference applies to unpublished decisions
  4. Navarro-Lopez v. Gonzales

    503 F.3d 1063 (9th Cir. 2007)   Cited 119 times
    Holding that a definition of moral turpitude that encompassed all criminal conduct would be overbroad and contrary to the intent of Congress
  5. Jean-Louis v. Att'y Gen. U.S.

    582 F.3d 462 (3d Cir. 2009)   Cited 81 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Finding the "realistic probability" test inapplicable where the statute's "elements ... are clear, and the ability of the government to prosecute a defendant under [the statute] is not disputed"
  6. Pelayo-Garcia v. Holder

    589 F.3d 1010 (9th Cir. 2009)   Cited 53 times
    Holding that unlawful sexual abuse of a minor under section 261.5(d) of the California Penal Code is not categorically an aggravated felony under 8 U.S.C. § 1101
  7. Morales-Garcia v. Holder

    567 F.3d 1058 (9th Cir. 2009)   Cited 48 times
    Holding that corporal injury against a cohabitant under § 273.5 is not a crime involving moral turpitude
  8. Quintero-Salazar v. Keisler

    506 F.3d 688 (9th Cir. 2007)   Cited 44 times   2 Legal Analyses
    Holding that statute criminalizing unlawful sexual intercourse with minor under 16 did not categorically involve moral turpitude; statute lacked scienter requirement and therefore "lack[ed] the requisite element of willfulness or evil intent"
  9. Nicanor-Romero v. Mukasey

    523 F.3d 992 (9th Cir. 2008)   Cited 39 times   2 Legal Analyses
    Holding that petitioner's conviction for annoying or molesting a child under 18 years of age did not constitute a "crime involving moral turpitude" or an aggravated felony under the categorical approach
  10. Saavedra-Figueroa v. Holder

    625 F.3d 621 (9th Cir. 2010)   Cited 32 times
    Holding crime at issue was not a CIMT as it “does not require any degree of scienter”
  11. Section 1101 - Definitions

    8 U.S.C. § 1101   Cited 16,705 times   91 Legal Analyses
    Finding notice and comment rulemaking is required for the agency's interim rule recognizing fear of coercive family practices as basis for refugee status
  12. Section 1227 - Deportable aliens

    8 U.S.C. § 1227   Cited 8,031 times   41 Legal Analyses
    Granting this discretion to the Attorney General
  13. Section 484 - Theft

    Cal. Pen. Code § 484   Cited 2,854 times   4 Legal Analyses
    Outlining the elements of both theories
  14. Section 236 - False imprisonment

    Cal. Pen. Code § 236   Cited 2,776 times
    Defining false imprisonment as "the unlawful violation of the personal liberty of another
  15. Section 261.5 - Unlawful sexual intercourse

    Cal. Pen. Code § 261.5   Cited 1,284 times   5 Legal Analyses
    Defining statutory rape, but requiring no mens rea
  16. Section 1103 - Powers and duties of the Secretary, the Under Secretary, and the Attorney General

    8 U.S.C. § 1103   Cited 847 times   4 Legal Analyses
    Granting the Attorney General power to "establish such regulations" and "review . . . administrative determinations in immigration proceedings"
  17. Section 488 - Petty theft

    Cal. Pen. Code § 488   Cited 536 times

    Theft in other cases is petty theft. Ca. Pen. Code § 488 Amended by Stats. 1927, Ch. 619.

  18. Section 11380 - Violation by use of a minor

    Cal. Health & Saf. Code § 11380   Cited 192 times
    Furnishing controlled substances to a minor
  19. Section 1240.8 - Burdens of proof in removal proceedings

    8 C.F.R. § 1240.8   Cited 312 times   4 Legal Analyses
    Applying "clearly and beyond doubt" burden to "proceedings commenced upon a respondent's arrival" or "[a]liens present in the United States without being admitted"