Holding that, to obtain CAT relief, it is insufficient merely to show that “the government has a problem controlling gang activity of which it is aware”
Concluding that petitioner's CAT application failed because petitioner failed to "establish that he could not travel to an area of the country where he would not be subject to torture"
Reviewing BIA's decision as final agency action, but to extent IJ's findings or reasoning are adopted, IJ's decision is also reviewed as part of final agency action; asylum claims are reviewed for substantial evidence based on record as whole
8 U.S.C. § 1231 Cited 7,961 times 13 Legal Analyses
Concluding that once petitioner's removal order was reinstated, he was no longer eligible for "relief" in the form of adjustment of status-even if he could obtain a Form I-212 waiver