§
In re A-R-C-G

6 Cited authorities

  1. Menjivar v. Gonzales

    416 F.3d 918 (8th Cir. 2005)   Cited 76 times
    Holding that, to obtain CAT relief, it is insufficient merely to show that “the government has a problem controlling gang activity of which it is aware”

  2. Davila-Mejia v. Mukasey

    531 F.3d 624 (8th Cir. 2008)   Cited 67 times
    Holding that status as "competing family business owners" did not give aliens "sufficient social visibility to be perceived as a group by society"

  3. Malonga v. Mukasey

    546 F.3d 546 (8th Cir. 2008)   Cited 57 times
    Concluding that petitioner's CAT application failed because petitioner failed to "establish that he could not travel to an area of the country where he would not be subject to torture"

  4. Gutierrez-Vidal v. Holder

    709 F.3d 728 (8th Cir. 2013)   Cited 21 times
    Reviewing BIA's decision as final agency action, but to extent IJ's findings or reasoning are adopted, IJ's decision is also reviewed as part of final agency action; asylum claims are reviewed for substantial evidence based on record as whole

  5. Section 1158 - Asylum

    8 U.S.C. § 1158   Cited 10,668 times   6 Legal Analyses
    Holding a "pattern or practice" of persecution requires it be "systemic, pervasive, or organized"

  6. Section 1231 - Detention and removal of aliens ordered removed

    8 U.S.C. § 1231   Cited 7,955 times   13 Legal Analyses
    Concluding that once petitioner's removal order was reinstated, he was no longer eligible for "relief" in the form of adjustment of status-even if he could obtain a Form I-212 waiver