§
In re A-A

22 Cited authorities

  1. Chevron U.S.A. v. Natural Res. Def. Council

    467 U.S. 837 (1984)   Cited 16,210 times   616 Legal Analyses
    Holding that courts "must give effect to the unambiguously expressed intent of Congress"

  2. Morrissey v. Brewer

    408 U.S. 471 (1972)   Cited 10,820 times   5 Legal Analyses
    Holding that parolees "must have an opportunity to be heard and to show . . . that circumstances in mitigation suggest that the violation does not warrant revocation"

  3. Gagnon v. Scarpelli

    411 U.S. 778 (1973)   Cited 5,285 times   3 Legal Analyses
    Holding that probation revocation is not a stage of criminal prosecution

  4. INS v. Cardoza-Fonseca

    480 U.S. 421 (1987)   Cited 2,409 times   4 Legal Analyses
    Holding that the phrase "well-founded fear," which is also found in 8 U.S.C. § 1101, is ambiguous

  5. Goldberg v. Kelly

    397 U.S. 254 (1970)   Cited 5,002 times   3 Legal Analyses
    Holding that due process rights attach to the deprivation of Government benefits

  6. Califano v. Yamasaki

    442 U.S. 682 (1979)   Cited 2,038 times   12 Legal Analyses
    Holding that claimants could bring social security class action "at least so long as the membership of the class is limited to those who meet the requirements of § 205(g)"

  7. Landon v. Plasencia

    459 U.S. 21 (1982)   Cited 623 times   3 Legal Analyses
    Holding that such aliens are entitled to protections of Due Process Clause in exclusion proceedings

  8. Specht v. Patterson

    386 U.S. 605 (1967)   Cited 630 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Holding that due process requires that an individual in commitment proceedings "be present with counsel, have an opportunity to be heard, be confronted with witnesses against him, have the right to cross-examine, and to offer evidence of his own"

  9. INS v. Phinpathya

    464 U.S. 183 (1984)   Cited 248 times
    Holding that thirty-two-year-old statute must still be given its plain meaning

  10. Harisiades v. Shaughnessy

    342 U.S. 580 (1952)   Cited 573 times
    Holding that the Ex Post Facto Clause does not apply to deportation orders because "[d]eportation, however severe its consequences, has been consistently classified as a civil rather than a criminal procedure"

  11. Section 1252 - Judicial review of orders of removal

    8 U.S.C. § 1252   Cited 43,245 times   37 Legal Analyses
    Holding court had no jurisdiction to review "any judgment regarding the granting of relief under section . . . 1229b"

  12. Section 1251 - Transferred

    8 U.S.C. § 1251   Cited 2,159 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Delineating crimes that make alien deportable

  13. Section 1252b - Repealed

    8 U.S.C. § 1252b   Cited 397 times
    Stating that time-and-place information could be provided "in the order to show cause or otherwise"

  14. Section 292.5 - Service upon and action by attorney or representative of record

    8 C.F.R. § 292.5   Cited 98 times
    Providing the right to counsel during an examination except for applicants for admission