Impressions, Inc.

12 Cited authorities

Machinists Local v. Labor Board
362 U.S. 411 (1960) Cited 276 times 2 Legal Analyses
Holding that “a finding of violation which is inescapably grounded on events predating the limitations period” is untimely
Labor Board v. Parts Co.
375 U.S. 405 (1964) Cited 213 times 1 Legal Analyses
Holding that the Act “prohibits not only intrusive threats and promises but also conduct immediately favorable to employees which is undertaken with the express purpose of impinging upon their freedom of choice for or against unionization and is reasonably calculated to have that effect.”
Hinson v. N.L.R.B
428 F.2d 133 (8th Cir. 1970) Cited 81 times 2 Legal Analyses
Holding that Section 302 "does not comprehend solely a collective bargaining agreement to the exclusion of any other possible written agreement"
Timken Roller Bearing Company v. N.L.R.B
325 F.2d 746 (6th Cir. 1963) Cited 56 times
In Timken Roller Bearing Co. v. NLRB, 325 F.2d 746 (6th Cir. 1963), cert. denied, 376 U.S. 971, 84 S.Ct. 1135, 12 L.Ed.2d 85 (1964), the court considered a union request for information concerning five grievances that awaited hearings before a chosen arbitrator.
N.L.R.B. v. Gulfmont Hotel Company
362 F.2d 588 (5th Cir. 1966) Cited 43 times
No. 22340. June 24, 1966. Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. Gen. Counsel, N.L.R.B., Theodore J. Martineau, Atty., N.L.R.B., Arnold Ordman, Gen. Counsel, Dominick L. Manoli, Associate Gen. Counsel, Nancy M. Sherman, Atty., N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C., for petitioner. H.L. Deakins, Jr., Houston, Tex., Fulbright, Crooker, Freeman, Bates Jaworski, Houston, Tex., of counsel, for appellee. Before TUTTLE, Chief Judge, RIVES, Circuit Judge, and CHOATE, District Judge. TUTTLE, Chief Judge: This petition by the
N.L.R.B. v. Little Rock Downtowner, Inc.
414 F.2d 1084 (8th Cir. 1969) Cited 37 times
No. 19427. August 19, 1969. Herman M. Levy, Atty., National Labor Relations Board, Washington, D.C., for petitioner, Arnold Ordman, Gen. Counsel, Dominick L. Manoli, Assoc. Gen. Counsel, Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. Gen. Counsel, and Jonathan M. Marks, Atty., N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C., on the brief. Richard A. Brackhahn, of Fowler, Brackhahn Young, Memphis, Tenn., for respondent, Newell N. Fowler, Memphis, Tenn., on the brief. Before VAN OOSTERHOUT, Chief Judge, and VOGEL and HEANEY, Circuit Judges
N.L.R.B. v. Tragniew, Inc.
470 F.2d 669 (9th Cir. 1972) Cited 26 times
In NLRB v. Tragniew, Inc., 470 F.2d 669 (9th Cir. 1972), this court held that evidence of an unfair labor practice that occurred beyond the 10(b) period could not be admitted in defense of a refusal to bargain charge.
Fafnir Bearing Company v. N.L.R.B
362 F.2d 716 (2d Cir. 1966) Cited 24 times
Relying upon the “clear and unmistakable waiver” rule
Ref-Chem Company v. N.L.R.B
418 F.2d 127 (5th Cir. 1969) Cited 17 times
Finding there was substantial evidence to justify the conclusion that a joint employer relationship existed in a case in which the alleged joint employer contractually had the "right to approve employees, control the number of employees, have an employee removed, inspect and approve work, pass on changes in pay and overtime allowed."
General Electric Company v. N.L.R.B
414 F.2d 918 (4th Cir. 1969) Cited 17 times
Holding that employer committed an unfair labor practice by failing to disclose results of survey of wages paid by other employers in the area in response to request by union
Section 151 - Findings and declaration of policy
29 U.S.C. § 151 Cited 5,091 times 34 Legal Analyses
Finding that "protection by law of the right of employees to organize and bargain collectively safeguards commerce" and declaring a policy of "encouraging the practice and procedure of collective bargaining"

Impressions, Inc.

12 Cited authorities

Holding that “a finding of violation which is inescapably grounded on events predating the limitations period” is untimely

Holding that the Act “prohibits not only intrusive threats and promises but also conduct immediately favorable to employees which is undertaken with the express purpose of impinging upon their freedom of choice for or against unionization and is reasonably calculated to have that effect.”

Holding that Section 302 "does not comprehend solely a collective bargaining agreement to the exclusion of any other possible written agreement"

In Timken Roller Bearing Co. v. NLRB, 325 F.2d 746 (6th Cir. 1963), cert. denied, 376 U.S. 971, 84 S.Ct. 1135, 12 L.Ed.2d 85 (1964), the court considered a union request for information concerning five grievances that awaited hearings before a chosen arbitrator.

In NLRB v. Tragniew, Inc., 470 F.2d 669 (9th Cir. 1972), this court held that evidence of an unfair labor practice that occurred beyond the 10(b) period could not be admitted in defense of a refusal to bargain charge.

Relying upon the “clear and unmistakable waiver” rule

Holding that employer committed an unfair labor practice by failing to disclose results of survey of wages paid by other employers in the area in response to request by union

Finding that "protection by law of the right of employees to organize and bargain collectively safeguards commerce" and declaring a policy of "encouraging the practice and procedure of collective bargaining"