§

Imperial House Condominium, Inc.

279 N.L.R.B. 1225 (N.L.R.B. 1986)
Imperial House Condominium, Inc.

14 Cited authorities

  1. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Amax Coal Co.

    453 U.S. 322 (1981)   Cited 368 times
    Holding that a management-appointed trustee to a multiemployer pension plan could not be considered a management representative

  2. Bricklayers, Etc., v. Stuart Plaster. Co.

    512 F.2d 1017 (5th Cir. 1975)   Cited 214 times
    Holding summary judgment appropriate where only issue to be resolved was legal sufficiency of documents

  3. United States v. Cianfrani

    573 F.2d 835 (3d Cir. 1978)   Cited 123 times
    Holding that there was “[n]o prior restraint ... involved” where the court imposed restrictions on information adduced at a pre-trial suppression hearing

  4. Moglia v. Geoghegan

    403 F.2d 110 (2d Cir. 1968)   Cited 120 times
    Holding that Section 302 was violated where "[a]ppellant conceded ... that at no time relevant ... there was a collective bargaining agreement or any written agreement" between the employer and the union

  5. Peoples Gas System, Inc. v. N.L.R.B

    629 F.2d 35 (D.C. Cir. 1980)   Cited 64 times
    In Peoples Gas, the court recognized, for the first time, the Board's obligation to provide a reasoned explanation for ordering an affirmative bargaining order: "A remedial order should recognize the competing considerations which are potentially affected by the remedy chosen, be grounded in factual determinations rather than speculation, and explain how, in light of present circumstances its remedy can be expected to effectuate the purposes of the Act."Id. at 45 (footnote omitted).

  6. Hinson v. N.L.R.B

    428 F.2d 133 (8th Cir. 1970)   Cited 81 times   2 Legal Analyses
    Holding that Section 302 "does not comprehend solely a collective bargaining agreement to the exclusion of any other possible written agreement"

  7. N.L.R.B. v. First Termite Control Co., Inc.

    646 F.2d 424 (9th Cir. 1981)   Cited 44 times
    Holding billing records inadmissible under business records exception where employee of receiving company had no knowledge of how the bills were made or maintained by the billing company

  8. Clear Pine Mouldings, Inc. v. N.L.R.B

    632 F.2d 721 (9th Cir. 1980)   Cited 38 times
    Ruling that "[h]ealth care plans are mandatory subjects of bargaining" under the NLRA, and holding that a company's unilateral, material changes to health care benefits violates the Act

  9. Terrell Machine Company v. N.L.R.B

    427 F.2d 1088 (4th Cir. 1970)   Cited 47 times

    No. 13371. Argued December 2, 1969. Decided January 20, 1970. William W. Sturges, Charlotte, N.C. (Weinstein, Waggoner, Sturges Odom, Charlotte, N.C., on the brief), for petitioner. Thomas E. Silfen, Atty., N.L.R.B. (Arnold Ordman, General Counsel, Dominick L. Manoli, Associate General Counsel, Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. General Counsel, and John D. Burgoyne, Atty., N.L.R.B., on the brief), for respondent. Before SOBELOFF and WINTER, Circuit Judges, and HARVEY, District Judge. WINTER, Circuit Judge:

  10. N.L.R.B. v. Gulfmont Hotel Company

    362 F.2d 588 (5th Cir. 1966)   Cited 43 times

    No. 22340. June 24, 1966. Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. Gen. Counsel, N.L.R.B., Theodore J. Martineau, Atty., N.L.R.B., Arnold Ordman, Gen. Counsel, Dominick L. Manoli, Associate Gen. Counsel, Nancy M. Sherman, Atty., N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C., for petitioner. H.L. Deakins, Jr., Houston, Tex., Fulbright, Crooker, Freeman, Bates Jaworski, Houston, Tex., of counsel, for appellee. Before TUTTLE, Chief Judge, RIVES, Circuit Judge, and CHOATE, District Judge. TUTTLE, Chief Judge: This petition by the