§
iLine, LLC

5 Cited authorities

  1. G. Heileman Brewing Co. v. Anheuser-Busch, Inc.

    873 F.2d 985 (7th Cir. 1989)   Cited 121 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Holding that "L.A." was a descriptive abbreviation for the descriptive words "low alcohol" for beer and no secondary meaning was acquired

  2. Anheuser-Busch Inc. v. Stroh Brewery Co.

    750 F.2d 631 (8th Cir. 1984)   Cited 60 times
    Holding "L.A." suggestive of low alcohol beer

  3. In re the American Fertility Society

    188 F.3d 1341 (Fed. Cir. 1999)   Cited 23 times   3 Legal Analyses
    Holding that an earlier precedential decision is binding precedent on later panels

  4. Application of Abcor Development Corp.

    588 F.2d 811 (C.C.P.A. 1978)   Cited 36 times   2 Legal Analyses
    In Abcor, the question before the court was whether applicant's alleged mark (GASBADGE) was "merely descriptive" within the meaning of § 2(e)(1) of the Lanham Act, 15 U.S.C. § 1052(e)(1).

  5. Modern Optics v. Univis Lens Company

    234 F.2d 504 (C.C.P.A. 1956)   Cited 10 times
    In Modern Optics v. Univis Lens Co., 234 F.2d 504, 43 C.C.P.A. 970, (1956), the court concluded that "CV" was a valid trademark even though it was composed of the initials of the words "continuous vision" which were alleged to be descriptive of trifocal lenses.