§
ILA, Local 1526

6 Cited authorities

  1. Steelworkers v. Warrior Gulf Co.

    363 U.S. 574 (1960)   Cited 5,612 times   6 Legal Analyses
    Holding that grievance machinery “is at the very heart of the system of industrial self-government” and the courts should not deny an order to arbitrate “unless it may be said with positive assurance that the arbitration clause is not susceptible of an interpretation that covers the asserted dispute”

  2. Steelworkers v. Enterprise Corp.

    363 U.S. 593 (1960)   Cited 3,893 times   2 Legal Analyses
    Holding that a reviewing court should not refuse to enforce an arbitral award merely because it would read the collective bargaining agreement differently than the arbitrator

  3. Steelworkers v. Am. Mfg. Co.

    363 U.S. 564 (1960)   Cited 2,229 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Holding that because the parties bargained for the “arbitrator's judgment,” the underlying “question of contract interpretation” is for the arbitrator, and the courts have “no business weighing the merits of the grievance”

  4. Carpenters' Union v. Labor Board

    357 U.S. 93 (1958)   Cited 201 times
    Rejecting Government position that we should defer to the Board's interpretation of the Interstate Commerce Act

  5. N.L.R.B. v. Bangor Bldg. Trades Council

    278 F.2d 287 (1st Cir. 1960)   Cited 21 times

    No. 5531. April 18, 1960. Fred S. Landess, Attorney, Washington, D.C., with whom Stuart Rothman, General Counsel, Thomas J. McDermott, Associate General Counsel, Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. General Counsel, and Melvin Pollack, Attorney, Washington, D.C., were on brief, for petitioner. Henry Wise, Boston, Mass., with whom Robert L. Wise and Wise Wise, Boston, Mass., were on brief, for respondents. Before WOODBURY, Chief Judge, and HARTIGAN and ALDRICH, Circuit Judges. ALDRICH, Circuit Judge. This

  6. International Un. of E., R. v. N.L.R.B

    434 F.2d 473 (D.C. Cir. 1970)   Cited 10 times

    Nos. 22671, 22804. Argued September 23, 1969. Decided March 20, 1970. Mr. Herbert Fishgold, Attorney, National Labor Relations Board, of the bar of the Court of Appeals of New York, pro hac vice, by special leave of court, with whom Messrs. Arnold Ordman, General Counsel, Dominick L. Manoli, Associate General Counsel, and Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Assistant General Counsel, National Labor Relations Board, were on the brief, for petitioners in No. 22,804 and respondent in No. 22,671. Mr. Russ R. Mueller