§

IdeasOne, Inc. v. Nationwide Better Health, Inc.

No. 92049636 (T.T.A.B. Mar. 12, 2009)
IdeasOne, Inc. v. Nationwide Better Health, Inc.

6 Cited authorities

  1. Lipton Industries, Inc. v. Ralston Purina

    670 F.2d 1024 (C.C.P.A. 1982)   Cited 58 times
    Holding that admission contained in an answer was binding, despite the fact that it was made "on information and belief"

  2. In re Canadian Pacific Ltd.

    754 F.2d 992 (Fed. Cir. 1985)   Cited 14 times
    Holding that offering services for sale to shareholders of a corporation do not constitute sales to another and thus do not fall within the Lanham Act

  3. Rule 12 - Defenses and Objections: When and How Presented; Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings; Consolidating Motions; Waiving Defenses; Pretrial Hearing

    Fed. R. Civ. P. 12   Cited 366,023 times   967 Legal Analyses
    Granting the court discretion to exclude matters outside the pleadings presented to the court in defense of a motion to dismiss

  4. Rule 8 - General Rules of Pleading

    Fed. R. Civ. P. 8   Cited 166,188 times   197 Legal Analyses
    Holding that "[e]very defense to a claim for relief in any pleading must be asserted in the responsive pleading. . . ."

  5. Section 3 - Trusts in Territories or District of Columbia illegal; combination a felony

    15 U.S.C. § 3   Cited 232 times   4 Legal Analyses

    (a) Every contract, combination in form of trust or otherwise, or conspiracy, in restraint of trade or commerce in any Territory of the United States or of the District of Columbia, or in restraint of trade or commerce between any such Territory and another, or between any such Territory or Territories and any State or States or the District of Columbia, or with foreign nations, or between the District of Columbia and any State or States or foreign nations, is declared illegal. Every person who shall

  6. Section 1068 - Action of Director in interference, opposition, and proceedings for concurrent use registration or for cancellation

    15 U.S.C. § 1068   Cited 25 times   3 Legal Analyses
    Stating that, in such proceedings, the Patent and Trademark Office may "modify the application or registration by limiting the goods or services specified therein"