§

Ideal Laundry Corp.

172 N.L.R.B. 1259 (N.L.R.B. 1968)
Ideal Laundry Corp.

15 Cited authorities

  1. N.L.R.B. v. Ideal Laundry Dry Cleaning Co.

    330 F.2d 712 (10th Cir. 1964)   Cited 34 times
    In NLRB v. Ideal Laundry Dry Cleaning Co., 10 Cir., 330 F.2d 712, this court held that when an employer had not been granted an opportunity for a full hearing during the interlocutory administrative procedures on the issue of the appropriateness of the bargaining unit such issue was open in the unfair practice hearing and thereafter on review in this court.

  2. Overnite Transportation Company v. N.L.R.B

    372 F.2d 765 (4th Cir. 1967)   Cited 28 times

    Nos. 10570, 10617. Argued November 4, 1966. Decided February 6, 1967. J.W. Alexander, Jr., Charlotte, N.C. (Ernest W. Machen, Jr., and Blakeney, Alexander Machen, Charlotte, N.C., on brief), for petitioner Overnite Transp. Co. Hugh J. Beins, Washington, D.C., (Michael F. Grdina, Willoughby, Ohio, on brief), for petitioner Teamsters Local Union No. 171. Gary Green, Atty., N.L.R.B. (Arnold Ordman, Gen. Counsel, Dominick L. Manoli, Associate Gen. Counsel, Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. Gen. Counsel, and

  3. N.L.R.B. v. Auto Ventshade, Inc.

    276 F.2d 303 (5th Cir. 1960)   Cited 36 times

    No. 17965. March 25, 1960. Rehearing Denied July 28, 1960. Melvin Pollack, Atty., Thomas J. McDermott, Associate Gen. Counsel, Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. Gen. Counsel, Stuart Rothman, Gen. Counsel, A. Brummel, Atty., N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C., for petitioner. Alexander E. Wilson, Jr., John W. Wilcox, Jr. (of Wilson, Branch Barwick), Atlanta, Ga., for respondent. Before RIVES, Chief Judge, and CAMERON and WISDOM, Circuit Judges. WISDOM, Circuit Judge. In this case, as in National Labor Relations

  4. N.L.R.B. v. Downtown Bakery Corp.

    330 F.2d 921 (6th Cir. 1964)   Cited 28 times
    In Downtown Bakery, the court upheld the policy of the NLRB that the employer, faced with competing demands for recognition, violated sections 8(a)(1), (2), and (3) of the Act by executing and maintaining a collective bargaining agreement with a rival union.

  5. N.L.R.B. v. McFarland

    306 F.2d 219 (10th Cir. 1962)   Cited 28 times

    No. 6801. June 22, 1962. William J. Avrutis, Washington, D.C. (Stuart Rothman, Dominick L. Manoll and Allison W. Brown, Jr., Washington, D.C., were with him on the brief), for petitioner. John F. Lee, Salt Lake City, Utah (Peter W. Billings, Salt Lake City, Utah, was with him on the brief), for respondent. Before MURRAH, Chief Judge, and BREITENSTEIN and HILL, Circuit Judges. MURRAH, Chief Judge. By this petition, the National Labor Relations Board seeks enforcement of its order requiring Respondent-McFarland

  6. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Colten

    105 F.2d 179 (6th Cir. 1939)   Cited 62 times
    In National Labor Relations Board v. Colten, 6 Cir., 105 F.2d 179, 183, it was said that "* * * the strife which is sought to be averted is no less an object of legislative solicitude when contract, death, or operation of law brings about change of ownership in the employing agency."

  7. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Armato

    199 F.2d 800 (7th Cir. 1952)   Cited 38 times

    No. 10691. November 19, 1952. George J. Bott, Gen. Counsel, David P. Findling, Associate Gen. Counsel, A. Norman Somers, Asst. Gen. Counsel, Thomas J. McDermott, Dominick L. Manoli, Attys., National Labor Relations Board, Washington, D.C., for petitioner. O.S. Hoebreckx and Clark M. Robertson, Robertson Hoebreckx, Milwaukee, Wis., for respondents. Before MAJOR, Chief Judge, and LINDLEY and SWAIM, Circuit Judges. LINDLEY, Circuit Judge. The National Labor Relations Board, pursuant to the provisions

  8. N.L.R.B. v. Alamo White Truck Service, Inc.

    273 F.2d 238 (5th Cir. 1959)   Cited 22 times

    No. 17764. December 29, 1959. Allison W. Brown, Jr., Atty., Thomas J. McDermott, Associate Gen. Counsel, Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. Gen. Counsel, Stuart Rothman, Gen. Counsel, Frederick U. Reel, Atty., N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C., for appellant. Theo. F. Weiss, Clemens, Knight, Weiss Spencer, San Antonio, Tex., for respondent. Before HUTCHESON, JONES and WISDOM, Circuit Judges. WISDOM, Circuit Judge. The question for decision is whether the respondent is a successor employer, for the purpose of

  9. Makela Welding, Inc., v. N.L.R.B

    387 F.2d 40 (6th Cir. 1967)   Cited 12 times

    No. 17348. December 15, 1967. Judith Bleich Kahn, Ann Arbor, Mich., for petitioners, Theodore Messner and Gerald Vairo, Messner LaBine, Houghton, Mich., on brief, Judith Bleich Kahn, Ann Arbor, Mich., of counsel. Nancy M. Sherman, N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C., for respondent, Arnold Ordman, Gen. Counsel, Dominick L. Manoli, Associate Gen. Counsel, Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. Gen. Counsel, Nancy M. Sherman, Atty., N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C., of counsel. Before PHILLIPS, PECK, and McCREE, Circuit Judges

  10. N.L.R.B. v. John Stepp's Friendly Ford, Inc.

    338 F.2d 833 (9th Cir. 1964)   Cited 12 times

    No. 19109. November 2, 1964. Arnold Ordman, Gen. Counsel, Dominick L. Manoli, Associate Gen. Counsel, Solomon I. Hirsh, Janet Kohn, Attys., N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C., for petitioner. D.A. Burr, G.F. Boney, Theodore M. Pease, Jr., Burr, Boney Pease, Neil S. Mackay, Anchorage, Alaska, for respondent. Before CHAMBERS, MERRILL and KOELSCH, Circuit Judges. MERRILL, Circuit Judge. The National Labor Relations Board has filed its petition for enforcement of an order issued April 2, 1963, against respondent