§

Ideal Laundry and Dry Cleaning Co.

152 N.L.R.B. 1130 (N.L.R.B. 1965)
Ideal Laundry and Dry Cleaning Co.

5 Cited authorities

  1. Pittsburgh Glass Co. v. Board

    313 U.S. 146 (1941)   Cited 294 times
    In Pittsburgh Glass, the Court held that it was not a denial of due process for the Board to refuse to consider evidence relating to the certification issue when petitioner first sought to introduce such evidence at the unfair labor practice hearing.

  2. N.L.R.B. v. Ideal Laundry Dry Cleaning Co.

    330 F.2d 712 (10th Cir. 1964)   Cited 34 times
    In NLRB v. Ideal Laundry Dry Cleaning Co., 10 Cir., 330 F.2d 712, this court held that when an employer had not been granted an opportunity for a full hearing during the interlocutory administrative procedures on the issue of the appropriateness of the bargaining unit such issue was open in the unfair practice hearing and thereafter on review in this court.

  3. N.L.R.B. v. Dewey Portland Cement Co.

    336 F.2d 117 (10th Cir. 1964)   Cited 16 times
    In National Labor Relations Board v. Dewey Portland Cement Company, 10 Cir., 336 F.2d 117, 119-120, we considered a situation where at the unfair labor practice hearing the Board rejected a specific offer of proof which included the desires of certain employees.

  4. National Lbr. Rel. Bd. v. Botany Worsted Mills

    133 F.2d 876 (3d Cir. 1943)   Cited 42 times

    Nos. 8132, 8133. Argued November 18, 1942. Decided January 18, 1943. Appeal from the National Labor Relations Board. Petition by the National Labor Relations Board to enforce the Board's order against the Botany Worsted Mills, and petition by the Botany Worsted Mills to set aside the Board's order. The Botany Worsted Mills moved to consolidate the petitions and for leave to adduce additional evidence. Petition of Board granted with modification in accordance with opinion, and petition of the respondent

  5. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Underwood Mach. Co.

    179 F.2d 118 (1st Cir. 1950)   Cited 11 times
    In NLRB v. Underwood Machinery Co., 179 F.2d 118, 121 (1st Cir. 1949), this court found the reasoning of Judge (later Justice) Minton's Marshall Field dissent "persuasive."