§

Ideal Elevator Corp.

295 N.L.R.B. 347 (N.L.R.B. 1989)
Ideal Elevator Corp.

4 Cited authorities

  1. Labor Board v. Parts Co.

    375 U.S. 405 (1964)   Cited 213 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Holding that the Act “prohibits not only intrusive threats and promises but also conduct immediately favorable to employees which is undertaken with the express purpose of impinging upon their freedom of choice for or against unionization and is reasonably calculated to have that effect.”

  2. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Action Automotive, Inc.

    469 U.S. 490 (1985)   Cited 44 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Upholding Board rule excluding from bargaining unit employees who are relatives of management

  3. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Caravelle Wd. Prod

    466 F.2d 675 (7th Cir. 1972)   Cited 13 times
    In NLRB v. Caravelle Wood Products, Inc., 466 F.2d 675, 678 (7th Cir. 1972) (Caravelle I), for example, the Seventh Circuit specifically stated that it "[would] not allow the Board to apply an automatic or per se rule to exclude spouses and children under section 9(b)...." It recognized, though, that "there are many precedents for the Board's exclusion on a case-by-case basis of relatives who enjoy a `special status,' such as privileges or favorable working conditions not granted other employees."

  4. N.L.R.B. v. Schroeder

    726 F.2d 967 (3d Cir. 1984)   Cited 3 times

    No. 83-3106. Argued November 16, 1983. Decided January 23, 1984. William M. Bernstein (Argued), William A. Lubbers, Gen. Counsel, John E. Higgins, Jr., Deputy Gen. Counsel, Robert E. Allen, Associate Gen. Counsel, Elliott Moore, Deputy Associate Gen. Counsel, N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C., for petitioner. John V. Adams, Jr. (Argued), Adams, Shoemaker McSorley, Pittsburgh, Pa., for respondent. Before ADAMS and BECKER, Circuit Judges, and NEWCOMER, District Judge. Honorable Clarence C. Newcomer, United