§
IDAB, Inc.

17 Cited authorities

  1. Universal Camera Corp. v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.

    340 U.S. 474 (1951)   Cited 9,722 times   3 Legal Analyses
    Holding that court may not "displace the Board's choice between two fairly conflicting views, even though the court would justifiably have made a different choice had the matter been before it de novo "

  2. N.L.R.B. v. Claxton Mfg. Co., Inc.

    613 F.2d 1364 (5th Cir. 1980)   Cited 31 times
    Stating that word of coercive conduct that spread throughout the plant created an "atmosphere of fear of coercion"

  3. N.L.R.B. v. Klingler Elec. Corp.

    656 F.2d 76 (5th Cir. 1981)   Cited 29 times
    In NLRB v. Klingler Electric Corp., 656 F.2d 76 (5th Cir. 1981), the Fifth Circuit interpreted 28 U.S.C. § 212(b), and possibly the Constitution itself, to require that witness statements be forwarded to the board as documentary evidence.

  4. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Bostik Division, USM Corp.

    517 F.2d 971 (6th Cir. 1975)   Cited 35 times
    In Bostik, the Sixth Circuit affirmed the Board's evaluation of twenty incidents—including twelve threats—that occurred during the course of a representation election.

  5. N.L.R.B. v. Carroll Contracting Ready-Mix

    636 F.2d 111 (5th Cir. 1981)   Cited 27 times
    In Carroll, 636 F.2d at 112-13, we set aside an election when two former employees wearing union signs on their hats and shirts stood in the parking lot outside the voting area and, as the employees standing in line to vote passed by them, "urged [those] employees to vote for the union and repeatedly gestured to the `Yes' box on the ballot pinned to their shirt[s]."

  6. Beaird-Poulan Division, Emerson, v. N.L.R.B

    649 F.2d 589 (8th Cir. 1981)   Cited 23 times
    Reading the determinative factor in Georgetown Dress to be the lack of a professional organizer on the scene

  7. N.L.R.B. v. Newton-New Haven Company

    506 F.2d 1035 (2d Cir. 1974)   Cited 26 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Refusing to grant relief on an untimely challenge to a Board decision issued by a panel consisting of one Board member and two staff attorneys, contrary to the NLRA's quorum requirements

  8. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Silverman's Men's Wear, Inc.

    656 F.2d 53 (3d Cir. 1981)   Cited 16 times
    Holding that a hearing was necessary in order to show, among other things, whether the "totality of circumstances surrounding [the racially inflammatory remark] evinced an atmosphere in which those remarks may reasonably be expected to have had a significant impact on the employees' free exercise of choice" and that the "burden of proving that the utterance was harmless" was on the party responsible for the racial slur

  9. Worley Mills, Inc. v. N.L.R.B

    685 F.2d 362 (10th Cir. 1982)   Cited 11 times
    Joking threat will not upset election result

  10. N.L.R.B. v. S. Prawer Co.

    584 F.2d 1099 (1st Cir. 1978)   Cited 14 times

    No. 78-1030. Argued June 5, 1978. Decided September 27, 1978. Jesse I. Etelson, Atty., N.L.R.B, Washington, D.C., with whom John S. Irving, Gen. Counsel, John E. Higgins, Jr., Deputy Gen. Counsel, Carl L. Taylor, Associate Gen. Counsel, Elliott Moore, Deputy Associate Gen. Counsel, and John H. Ferguson, Atty., Washington, D.C., were on brief, for petitioner. Harold N. Mack, Boston, Mass., with whom Philip J. Moss, and Morgan, Brown, Kearns Joy, Boston, Mass., were on brief, for respondent. Petition