IBEW Local 429 and its agent Nashville Electrical Joint Apprenticeship Training Committee (JATC) (El

8 Cited authorities

  1. California Labor Stds. Enf. v. Dillingham Constr

    519 U.S. 316 (1997)   Cited 741 times   11 Legal Analyses
    Holding that ERISA did not pre-empt a California statute that incentivized, but did not require, plans to follow certain standards for apprenticeship programs
  2. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Amax Coal Co.

    453 U.S. 322 (1981)   Cited 368 times
    Holding that a management-appointed trustee to a multiemployer pension plan could not be considered a management representative
  3. Honolulu Joint Local Union No. 675 v. Foster

    332 F.3d 1234 (9th Cir. 2003)   Cited 46 times
    Holding that a union could not sue a defendant who obtained a scholarship loan under § 502 for unjust enrichment after the defendant went to work for a non-union employer and failed to pay back the loan, contrary to the scholarship agreement
  4. N.L.R.B. v. Int'l Brotherhood

    514 F.3d 646 (6th Cir. 2008)   Cited 7 times
    Holding that the Board has initial burden of showing that protected conduct was a "motivating factor" in the union’s discrimination against an employee in violation of § 8(b)
  5. N.L.R.B. v. Int'l Longshoremen's W. U

    514 F.2d 481 (9th Cir. 1975)   Cited 21 times

    No. 73-3239. April 15, 1975. Elliott Moore, Asst. Gen. Counsel, NLRB, Joseph E. Mayer, Robert Fulton Dashiell, Attys., NLRB, and Morris R. Bond, Sequim, Wash., for petitioner. Robert D. Duggan, Seattle, Wash. and Norman Leonard, San Francisco, Cal., for respondent. Before DUNIWAY and KILKENNY, Circuit Judges, and SWEIGERT, District Judge. The Honorable William T. Sweigert, Senior United States District Judge for the Northern District of California, sitting by designation. OPINION SWEIGERT, Senior

  6. Griffith Co., v. National Labor Relations Bd.

    660 F.2d 406 (9th Cir. 1981)   Cited 10 times
    Holding that neither the administrator of a pension fund nor his counsel was an agent of the Union
  7. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Ogle Protection Service, Inc.

    444 F.2d 502 (6th Cir. 1971)   Cited 3 times   3 Legal Analyses

    No. 21049. June 30, 1971. Stanley R. Zirkin, Atty., N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C., for petitioner; Arnold Ordman, Gen. Counsel, Dominick L. Manoli, Associate Gen. Counsel, Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. Gen. Counsel, Elliott Moore, Stanley R. Zirkin, Attys., N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C., on brief. Douglas C. Dahn, Detroit, Mich., for respondents; Tolleson, Burgess Mead, Robert D. Welchli, Detroit, Mich., on brief. Before CELEBREZZE, PECK and McCREE, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM. This case is before us a second

  8. Section 1002 - Definitions

    29 U.S.C. § 1002   Cited 11,262 times   60 Legal Analyses
    Holding that ERISA is a federal law that sets standards of protection for individuals in most voluntarily established, private-sector retirement plans