3 Cited authorities
Spanos v. Boschen
61 A.D.2d 837 (N.Y. App. Div. 1978) Cited 2 timesFebruary 27, 1978 In an action, inter alia, to vacate the release of a restrictive covenant, plaintiffs appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County, entered July 25, 1977, which granted defendant's motion to dismiss the complaint. Order affirmed, with $50 costs and disbursements. Plaintiffs brought this action jointly, as directors of Scott's Beach Club, Inc., to nullify a release of a restrictive covenant granted to defendant. There is nothing in the record to indicate that this action
Ferro Concrete Const. Co. v. United States
112 F.2d 488 (1st Cir. 1940) Cited 20 timesNo. 3500. June 4, 1940. Appeal from the District Court of the United States for the District of Rhode Island; John C. Mahoney, Judge. Action by the United States of America, for the use and benefit of James E. Hicks and Manford E. Hicks, co-partners doing business as M.E. Hicks Son, against the Ferro Concrete Construction Company as contractor and the Seaboard Surety Company as surety, wherein Luigi Luchini and James Luchini, doing business as L. Luchini Son, filed an intervening petition, and wherein
Beveridge v. N.Y.E.R. Co.
112 N.Y. 1 (N.Y. 1889) Cited 84 timesIn Beveridge v. New York Elevated R.R. Co. (112 N.Y. 1) (at p. 26) Judge GRAY writing for the court says: "Where the plaintiff seeks to base his right to maintain his action against a third party upon a contract made between that party and another, it must be one made or intended for his benefit.