IATSE, Local 659

14 Cited authorities

Humphrey v. Moore
375 U.S. 335 (1964) Cited 760 times
Holding that the union did not breach its duty of fair representation in negotiating a deal which favored some members of the same bargaining unit over others
Ford Motor Co. v. Huffman
345 U.S. 330 (1953) Cited 882 times 1 Legal Analyses
Holding that a union acting in its representative capacity owes a duty of fair representation to those on whose behalf it acts
Machinists Local v. Labor Board
362 U.S. 411 (1960) Cited 276 times 2 Legal Analyses
Holding that “a finding of violation which is inescapably grounded on events predating the limitations period” is untimely
Teamsters Local v. Labor Board
365 U.S. 667 (1961) Cited 174 times
Holding that the Board may not dictate specific procedures and rules that a union must adopt, not that the Board errs when it determines that a union engaged in unfair labor practices by failing to operate in accordance with objective criteria
Wallace Corp. v. Labor Board
323 U.S. 248 (1944) Cited 162 times 1 Legal Analyses
Holding that corporation committed unfair labor practice
Labor Board v. News Syndicate Co.
365 U.S. 695 (1961) Cited 22 times
In NLRB v. News Syndicate Co., 365 U.S. 695, 81 S.Ct. 849, 6 L.Ed.2d 29 (1961), where the bargaining unit included supervisors, the NLRB had found that both the employer and the union had committed unfair labor practices by operating an unlawful closed shop and preferential hiring system.
N.L.R.B. v. Bagel Bakers Council
434 F.2d 884 (2d Cir. 1970) Cited 18 times
In NLRB v. Bagel Bakers Council, supra, we enforced a decision and order of the Board which found that the employers, Bagel Bakers Council of Greater New York and sixteen of its constituent members, had committed unfair labor practices in violation of the Act by unlawfully locking out members of Bagel Bakers Union Local 338 of the Bakery and Confectionary Workers International Union of America.
Schick v. N.L.R.B
409 F.2d 395 (7th Cir. 1969) Cited 14 times
No. 16799. April 3, 1969. James R. Cox, David Shields, Chicago, Ill., for petitioners. Arnold L. Burke, Axelrod, Goodman Steiner, Chicago, Ill., for intervenor, Transport Motor Express, Inc. Sherman Carmell, Sheldon M. Charone, Lawrence J. Weiner, Chicago, Ill., for Intervenor Local 705, Carmell Charone, Chicago, Ill., of counsel. Asher, Greenfield, Gubbins Segall, Chicago, Ill., for Local Union No. 710, Lester Asher, Chicago, Ill., of counsel. Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. Gen. Counsel, Glen M. Bendixsen
N.L.R.B. v. Dover Tavern Owners' Association
412 F.2d 725 (3d Cir. 1969) Cited 13 times
No. 17546. Argued May 9, 1969. Decided June 11, 1969. Joseph Yablonski, N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C. (Arnold Ordman, General Counsel, Dominick L. Manoli, Associate General Counsel, Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. General Counsel, Elliott Moore, Attorney, N.L.R.B., on the brief), for petitioner. Milford Salny, Netcong, N.J., for respondents. Before McLAUGHLIN, KALODNER and VAN DUSEN, Circuit Judges. OPINION OF THE COURT VAN DUSEN, Circuit Judge. This case is before us on a petition for enforcement of the
N.L.R.B. v. Whiting Milk Corp.
342 F.2d 8 (1st Cir. 1965) Cited 13 times
In Whiting, we construed a clause in a multi-employer collective bargaining agreement which provided in substance that "in the event of acquisition by a signatory company of another Union company the seniority of the Union employees of the latter carried over into the acquiring company."

IATSE, Local 659

14 Cited authorities

Holding that the union did not breach its duty of fair representation in negotiating a deal which favored some members of the same bargaining unit over others

Holding that a union acting in its representative capacity owes a duty of fair representation to those on whose behalf it acts

Holding that “a finding of violation which is inescapably grounded on events predating the limitations period” is untimely

Holding that the Board may not dictate specific procedures and rules that a union must adopt, not that the Board errs when it determines that a union engaged in unfair labor practices by failing to operate in accordance with objective criteria

Holding that corporation committed unfair labor practice

In NLRB v. News Syndicate Co., 365 U.S. 695, 81 S.Ct. 849, 6 L.Ed.2d 29 (1961), where the bargaining unit included supervisors, the NLRB had found that both the employer and the union had committed unfair labor practices by operating an unlawful closed shop and preferential hiring system.

In Whiting, we construed a clause in a multi-employer collective bargaining agreement which provided in substance that "in the event of acquisition by a signatory company of another Union company the seniority of the Union employees of the latter carried over into the acquiring company."