Ian S.,1 Complainant, v. Steven T. Mnuchin, Secretary, Department of the Treasury (Internal Revenue Service), Agency.

18 Cited authorities

  1. County of Allegheny v. American Civil Liberties Union

    492 U.S. 573 (1989)   Cited 764 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Holding the display of a creche in a courthouse unconstitutional but allowing the display of a menorah outside a county building
  2. Ansonia Bd. of Educ. v. Philbrook

    479 U.S. 60 (1986)   Cited 447 times   5 Legal Analyses
    Holding an accommodation is reasonable where it "allow the individual to observe fully religious holy days and requires him only to give up compensation for a day that he did not in fact work"
  3. Wilshin v. Allstate Ins. Co.

    212 F. Supp. 2d 1360 (M.D. Ga. 2002)   Cited 19 times   6 Legal Analyses
    Holding defendant waived its right to argue plaintiff failed to satisfy condition precedent because defendant made only a general denial in its answer and did not raise the issue until filing a motion for summary judgment more than two years after the case was filed
  4. Section 2000e - Definitions

    42 U.S.C. § 2000e   Cited 51,678 times   129 Legal Analyses
    Granting EEOC authority to issue procedural regulations to carry out Title VII provisions
  5. Section 2000e-16 - Employment by Federal Government

    42 U.S.C. § 2000e-16   Cited 4,954 times   20 Legal Analyses
    Adopting provisions of § 2000e-5(f)-(k), including that "[e]ach United States district court . . . shall have jurisdiction of actions brought under this subchapter"
  6. Section 1614.105 - Pre-complaint processing

    29 C.F.R. § 1614.105   Cited 2,630 times   13 Legal Analyses
    Requiring complainant initially to notify agency and make effort to resolve matter informally
  7. Section 1614.407 - Civil action: Title VII, Age Discrimination in Employment Act, Rehabilitation Act, Genetic Information Nondiscrimination Act, and Pregnant Workers Fairness Act

    29 C.F.R. § 1614.407   Cited 738 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Authorizing civil actions if no final action is taken within 180 days after a complaint is filed
  8. Section 1614.107 - Dismissals of complaints

    29 C.F.R. § 1614.107   Cited 472 times   5 Legal Analyses
    Explaining the notice requirements for partial dismissal of claims in an EEO complaint
  9. Section 1614.302 - Mixed case complaints

    29 C.F.R. § 1614.302   Cited 402 times   2 Legal Analyses
    Recognizing that once a formal appeal or complaint is filed in either forum, it "shall be considered an election to proceed in that forum"
  10. Section 1614.110 - Final action by agencies

    29 C.F.R. § 1614.110   Cited 226 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Compelling final decision “within 60 days of the end of the 30-day period for the complainant to request a hearing . . . where the complainant has not requested [one]”
  11. Section 1614.108 - Investigation of complaints

    29 C.F.R. § 1614.108   Cited 179 times   2 Legal Analyses
    Describing inquisitorial nature of investigation process
  12. Section 1614.604 - Filing and computation of time

    29 C.F.R. § 1614.604   Cited 137 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Providing the time limits applicable to the subject regulations "are subject to waiver, estoppel and equitable tolling"
  13. Section 1614.408 - Civil action: Equal Pay Act

    29 C.F.R. § 1614.408   Cited 113 times
    Requiring that the complainant wait at least 180 days for a decision from the agency before filing a civil action and requiring that such an action be filed within 90 days of a final decision
  14. Section 1605.2 - Reasonable accommodation without undue hardship as required by section 701(j) of title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964

    29 C.F.R. § 1605.2   Cited 83 times   10 Legal Analyses
    In 29 C.F.R. § 1605.2(e), the EEOC states that it will determine "undue hardship" as "more than a de minimis cost" in accordance with Hardison.
  15. Section 1614.405 - Decisions on appeals

    29 C.F.R. § 1614.405   Cited 81 times   3 Legal Analyses
    Providing that " decision [of the EEOC in an administrative appeal] is final . . . unless . . . [e]ither party files a timely request for reconsideration"