§

I C Refrigeration Service, Inc.

200 N.L.R.B. 687 (N.L.R.B. 1972)
I C Refrigeration Service, Inc.

5 Cited authorities

  1. N.L.R.B. v. Sheridan Creations, Inc.

    357 F.2d 245 (2d Cir. 1966)   Cited 44 times
    In NLRB v. Sheridan Creations, Inc., 357 F.2d 245 (2d Cir. 1966), cert. denied 385 U.S. 1005, 87 S.Ct. 711, 17 L.Ed.2d 544 (1967), the employer contended that its attempted withdrawal from the multi-employer bargaining unit was authorized because three of its four employees desired not to be represented by the union.

  2. N.L.R.B. v. Tulsa Sheet Metal Works, Inc.

    367 F.2d 55 (10th Cir. 1966)   Cited 29 times
    Holding that where an agreement contains a “savings and severability” clause, the agreement “should not be completely obliterated because some provisions are beyond the legal limits ... unless such illegal provisions permeate the complete contract to such an extent as to affects its enforceability entirely”

  3. Retail Clerks Union, No. 1550 v. N.L.R.B

    330 F.2d 210 (D.C. Cir. 1964)   Cited 18 times

    No. 17726. Argued November 27, 1963. Decided January 23, 1964. Mr. S.G. Lippman, Washington, D.C., with whom Mr. Russell Specter, Washington, D.C., was on the brief, for petitioners. Mr. Tim L. Bornstein, Washington, D.C., also entered an appearance for petitioners. Mr. Warren M. Davison, Attorney, National Labor Relations Board, with whom Messrs. Dominick L. Manoli, Associate General Counsel, Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. General Counsel, and Peter M. Giesey, Attorney, National Labor Relations Board

  4. N.L.R.B. v. Jeffries Banknote Company

    281 F.2d 893 (9th Cir. 1960)   Cited 18 times

    No. 16700. September 6, 1960. Stuart Rothman, Gen. Counsel, Dominick L. Manoli, Associate Gen. Counsel, Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. Gen. Counsel, Duane B. Beeson, Richard J. Scupi, Attys., N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C., J.H. Doesburg, Jr., J.N. Goddess, Chicago, Ill., for respondent. Before ORR and HAMLIN, Circuit Judges, and EAST, District Judge. HAMLIN, Circuit Judge. Before the Court is a petition of the National Labor Relations Board for the enforcement of an order of the Board dated September

  5. Universal Insulation Corporation v. N.L.R.B

    361 F.2d 406 (6th Cir. 1966)   Cited 12 times
    In Universal Insulation v. NLRB, 361 F.2d 406 (6th Cir. 1967), we held that under the special facts of that case one employer's attempt to withdraw from a multi-employer unit, after that unit had begun bargaining and had arrived at a contract with a union, was untimely.