§
Hyster Co.

13 Cited authorities

  1. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Gissel Packing Co.

    395 U.S. 575 (1969)   Cited 1,038 times   71 Legal Analyses
    Holding a bargaining order may be necessary "to re-establish the conditions as they existed before the employer's unlawful campaign"

  2. Atlas Engine Works v. National Labor Relations Bd.

    395 U.S. 828 (1969)   Cited 31 times

    ON PETITION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT. No. 598. Decided June 23, 1969. Together with No. 906, Thrift Drug Co. of Pennsylvania v. National Labor Relations Board, and No. 1213, Lou De Young's Market Basket, Inc. v. National Labor Relations Board, also on petitions for writs of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit; and No. 1273, National Labor Relations Board v. Pembek Oil Corp., on petition for writ of certiorari

  3. United States v. Stoehr

    196 F.2d 276 (3d Cir. 1952)   Cited 96 times
    Finding that offer in compromise filed long after taxpayer learned of tax liability and without his having made any payment on the amount owed "destroyed whatever probative value a prompt offer might have had."

  4. Colson Corporation v. N.L.R.B

    347 F.2d 128 (8th Cir. 1965)   Cited 35 times
    Finding that a repudiation three weeks after unlawful conduct was inadequate

  5. Amalgamated Clothing Wrks. of Am. v. N.L.R.B

    371 F.2d 740 (D.C. Cir. 1966)   Cited 29 times
    Considering employer's "lack of disavowal" of individual's actions

  6. N.L.R.B. v. Pembeck Oil Corp.

    404 F.2d 105 (2d Cir. 1968)   Cited 16 times
    In Pembeck, decided after Better Val-U Stores, Judge Hays again dissented, pointing out that neither Flomatic nor Val-U Stores had reached to § 8(a)(5) cases and urging that the "flagrant violation" standard not be extended to such cases.

  7. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Bush Hog, Inc.

    405 F.2d 755 (5th Cir. 1968)   Cited 14 times

    No. 25593. December 26, 1968. Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. Gen. Counsel, Arnold Ordman, Gen. Counsel, Dominick L. Manoli, Associate Gen. Counsel, Arthur A. Horowitz, Warren M. Davison, Attys., NLRB, Washington, D.C., for petitioner. William F. Gardner, J. Michael Rediker, Cabaniss, Johnston, Gardner Clark, Birmingham, Ala., Sam Earle Hobbs, Craig, Hobbs Hain, Selma, Ala., for respondent, Bush Hog, Inc. Before BROWN, Chief Judge, and RIVES and McENTEE, Circuit Judges. Of the First Circuit, sitting

  8. N.L.R.B. v. Lake Butler Apparel Company

    392 F.2d 76 (5th Cir. 1968)   Cited 13 times

    No. 24687. March 25, 1968. Allen J. Berk, Atty., N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C., for petitioner. Daniel R. Coffman, Jr., Jacksonville, Fla., for respondent. Before BELL, GOLDBERG and DYER, Circuit Judges. GRIFFIN B. BELL, Circuit Judge. The Board seeks enforcement of its order holding that Respondent violated §§ 8(a)(1) and 8(a)(5) and (1) of the Labor-Management Relations Act. 29 U.S.C.A. §§ 158(a)(1) and (5). The § 8(a)(1) violation is based on alleged coercion of employees in the exercise of their

  9. Henry I. Siegel Co. v. N.L.R.B

    417 F.2d 1206 (6th Cir. 1969)   Cited 10 times
    In Henry I. Siegel, we held that we will examine the context of statements and the atmosphere in which they were made to determine whether they constitute "a permissible forceful argument in opposition to the union or a veiled threat to the employees in the event the union should win the election."

  10. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Montgomery Ward

    242 F.2d 497 (2d Cir. 1957)   Cited 23 times

    No. 211, Docket 24251. Argued January 11, 1957. Decided March 18, 1957. Theophil C. Kammholtz, Gen. Counsel, Stephen Leonard, Assoc. Gen. Counsel, Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. Gen. Counsel, Samuel M. Singer and Florian J. Bartosic, Attys., N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C., for petitioner. Charles J. Barnhill and David L. Dickson, Chicago, Ill., and T.W. Madden, New York, N.Y., for respondent. Before CLARK, Chief Judge, and LUMBARD and WATERMAN, Circuit Judges. LUMBARD, Circuit Judge. The National Labor