§

Hydro Conduit Corp.

278 N.L.R.B. 1124 (N.L.R.B. 1986)
Hydro Conduit Corp.

6 Cited authorities

  1. N.L.R.B. v. Tahoe Nugget, Inc.

    584 F.2d 293 (9th Cir. 1978)   Cited 58 times
    In Tahoe Nugget and Sahara-Tahoe we stressed that the evidence presented to establish reasonable good faith doubt, individually or cumulatively, must unequivocally indicate that union support had declined to a minority.

  2. N.L.R.B. v. Donkin's Inn, Inc.

    532 F.2d 138 (9th Cir. 1976)   Cited 41 times

    No. 74-3252. March 4, 1976. Rehearing Denied April 28, 1976. Edmund Cooke, Atty. (argued), NLRB, Washington, D.C., for petitioner. Robert S. Rose (argued), of Harris Aranda, Marina Del Rey, Cal., for respondent. Before CHAMBERS, TRASK and WALLACE, Circuit Judges. OPINION TRASK, Circuit Judge: This is an application for Enforcement of an Order of the NLRB, issued on October 9, 1974, against Donkin's Inn, Inc. (hereafter, "the Company") for certain violations of sections 8(a)(5) and 8(a)(1) of the

  3. Pepsi-Cola Bottling Co., Etc. v. N.L.R.B

    659 F.2d 87 (8th Cir. 1981)   Cited 26 times
    In Pepsi Cola Bottling Co. v. NLRB, 659 F.2d 87 (8th Cir. 1981) (Pepsi Cola), the union initially rejected the offer and three weeks passed between offer and acceptance. During the three-week interval, the employer met with the union for several bargaining sessions but did not expressly withdraw its offer.

  4. N.L.R.B. v. Pennco, Inc.

    684 F.2d 340 (6th Cir. 1982)   Cited 18 times

    No. 80-1654. March 16, 1982. Rehearing Denied April 8, 1982. Certiorari Denied November 8, 1982. Elliott Moore, Deputy Associate Gen. Counsel, N.L.R.B., David Fleischer, Washington, D.C., for petitioner. Gregory L. Monge, Van Antwerp, Hughes, Monge Jones, Ashland, Ky., for respondent. Before BROWN and KENNEDY, Circuit Judges and CHURCHILL, District Judge. The Honorable James P. Churchill, United States District Court for the Eastern District of Michigan, sitting by designation. ORDER The Board petitions

  5. Thomas Industries, Inc. v. N.L.R.B

    687 F.2d 863 (6th Cir. 1982)   Cited 16 times
    In Thomas Industries, 687 F.2d at 869, this Court, in finding that a poll satisfied the procedural requirements set forth in Struksnes, relied in part on the fact that the union president was present, and spoke to employees before they voted.

  6. Lozano Enterprises v. N.L.R.B

    327 F.2d 814 (9th Cir. 1964)   Cited 26 times
    In Lozano Enterprises v. NLRB, supra, 327 F.2d 814, a complete tentative agreement was reached; this was revised and then signed by the company's president but retained, until after the certification year expired, by its labor consultant, with a misrepresentation on his part to the union that the agreement had not been signed.