§

Hyde's Super Market

145 N.L.R.B. 1252 (N.L.R.B. 1964)
Hyde's Super Market

15 Cited authorities

  1. Labor Board v. Katz

    369 U.S. 736 (1962)   Cited 710 times   29 Legal Analyses
    Holding that "an employer's unilateral change in conditions of employment under negotiation" is a violation of the National Labor Relations Act because "it is a circumvention of the duty to negotiate"

  2. Labor Board v. Steelworkers

    357 U.S. 357 (1958)   Cited 72 times
    In United Steelworkers, the Court warned that the NLRA "does not command that labor organizations as a matter of abstract law, under all circumstances, be protected in the use of every possible means of reaching the minds of individual workers, nor that they are entitled to use a medium of communication simply because the employer is using it."

  3. N.L.R.B. v. Birmingham Publishing Company

    262 F.2d 2 (5th Cir. 1959)   Cited 66 times
    In NLRB v. Birmingham, supra, 262 F.2d at 6-8, an employee requested from company supervisors information on how to transfer to another union.

  4. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Cambria Clay Prod

    215 F.2d 48 (6th Cir. 1954)   Cited 35 times

    No. 12072. July 7, 1954. Frederick U. Reel, Washington, D.C. (George J. Bott, David P. Findling, A. Norman Somers, Frederick U. Reel, Thomas R. Haley, N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C., on the brief), for petitioner. J. Mack Swigert, Cincinnati, Ohio (J. Mack Swigert, Charles D. Lindberg, Cincinnati, Ohio, on the brief; Miller, Searl Fitch, Portsmouth, Ohio, of counsel), for respondent. Before McALLISTER and MILLER, Circuit Judges, and GOURLEY, District Judge. McALLISTER, Circuit Judge. The National Labor

  5. N.L.R.B. v. Overnite Transportation Company

    308 F.2d 279 (4th Cir. 1962)   Cited 13 times

    No. 8497. Argued March 22, 1962. Decided September 4, 1962. Robert Sewell, Attorney, National Labor Relations Board (Stuart Rothman, Gen. Counsel, Dominick L. Manoli, Associate Gen. Counsel, Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. Gen. Counsel, and Melvin Pollack, Attorney, National Labor Relations Board, on the brief), for petitioner. Ernest W. Machen, Jr., Charlotte, N.C. (J.W. Alexander, Jr., and Blakeney, Alexander Machen, Charlotte, N.C., on the brief), for respondent. Before SOBELOFF, Chief Judge, and

  6. N.L.R.B. v. H. Rohtstein Co.

    266 F.2d 407 (1st Cir. 1959)   Cited 11 times
    In NLRB v. Rohtstein Co., 266 F.2d 407, 409 (CA1, 1959), the First Circuit held that similar misrepresentations invalidated a card necessary for a majority, and therefore declined to enforce the Board's bargaining order.

  7. N.L.R.B. v. Guild Industries Mfg. Corp.

    321 F.2d 108 (5th Cir. 1963)   Cited 7 times

    No. 19736. July 10, 1963. Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. Gen. Counsel, N.L.R.B., Dominick L. Manoli, Associate Gen. Counsel, N.L.R.B., Melvin Pollack, Atty., N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C., Stuart Rothman, General Counsel, Robert A. Armstrong, Attorney, N.L.R.B., for petitioner. Paul A. Saad, Granville M. Alley, Jr., of Fowler, White, Gillen, Humkey Trenam, Raymond J. Malloy, Tampa, Fla., Warren E. Hall, Jr., Bartow, Fla., Mabry, Reaves, Carlton, Fields Ward, Tampa, Fla., for respondents. Before TUTTLE

  8. Trumbull Asphalt Co. of Delaware v. N.L.R.B

    314 F.2d 382 (7th Cir. 1963)   Cited 5 times

    No. 13743. March 4, 1963. James F. Flanagan, Harold T. Halfpenny, Richard F. Hahn, Mary M. Shaw, Chicago, Ill., for petitioner. Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. Gen. Counsel, Melvin Pollack, Atty., Stuart Rothman, Gen. Counsel, Dominick L. Manoli, Assoc. Gen. Counsel, Judith Bleich Kahn, Atty., National Labor Relations Bd., Washington, D.C., for respondent. Before HASTINGS, Chief Judge, and KNOCH and SWYGERT, Circuit Judges. HASTINGS, Chief Judge. This matter is before us on petition of Trumbull Asphalt

  9. N.L.R.B. v. INT'L ASS'N OF MACHINISTS, ETC

    263 F.2d 796 (9th Cir. 1959)   Cited 8 times
    In N.L.R.B. v. International Ass'n of Machinists, 9 Cir., 263 F.2d 796, 799, it was held that the actions of a union in listing an employer on its "'We Do Not Patronize' list" and in urging others not to do business with him were protected by the First Amendment and did not constitute unfair labor practice.

  10. National L. Rel. Bd. v. Charles R. Krimm L

    203 F.2d 194 (2d Cir. 1953)   Cited 9 times

    No. 172, Docket 22558. Argued March 12, 1953. Decided April 2, 1953. George J. Bott, General Counsel, David P. Findling, Associate General Counsel, A. Norman Somers, Asst. General Counsel, Arnold Ordman and Maurice Alexandre, Attorneys, National Labor Relations Board, Washington, D.C., Maurice Alexandre, Washington, D.C., of counsel, for petitioner. Joseph M. McNerney and McNerney Page, Williamsport, Pa., for respondent, Charles R. Krimm Lumber Co. Robert W. Bascom, Fort Edward, N.Y., for respondent