§

Hyde Leadership Charter School - Brooklyn

364 N.L.R.B. 88 (N.L.R.B. 2016)
Hyde Leadership Charter School - Brooklyn

9 Cited authorities

  1. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Canning

    573 U.S. 513 (2014)   Cited 280 times   150 Legal Analyses
    Holding that because there was no quorum of validly appointed board members, the NLRB “lacked authority to act,” and the enforcement order was therefore “void ab initio ”

  2. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Natural Gas Utility District

    402 U.S. 600 (1971)   Cited 187 times   32 Legal Analyses
    Holding utility district was political subdivision under that standard

  3. In re N.Y. Charter School Assoc

    2009 N.Y. Slip Op. 5204 (N.Y. 2009)   Cited 25 times
    Holding that charter schools are not political subdivisions of the State, and the task of auditing charter schools was not incidental to audits of public school districts

  4. New York Charter School Ass'n v. Smith

    2010 N.Y. Slip Op. 7375 (N.Y. 2010)   Cited 10 times   1 Legal Analyses
    In Matter of New York Charter School Association v. Smith, 15 N.Y.3d 403, 914 N.Y.S.2d 696 [2010], the court held that charter schools are not “public entities” as defined in Labor Law § 220 subject to the prevailing wage rate requirements under Article I, § 17 of the State Constitution.

  5. Buffalo United Charter Sch. v. N.Y. State Pub. Emp't Relations Bd.

    107 A.D.3d 1437 (N.Y. App. Div. 2013)   Cited 5 times

    2013-06-7 BUFFALO UNITED CHARTER SCHOOL, Brooklyn Excelsior Charter School and National Heritage Academies, Inc., Petitioners–Appellants–Respondents, v. NEW YORK STATE PUBLIC EMPLOYMENT RELATIONS BOARD, Council of School Supervisors and Administrators, Local 1, AFSA, Respondents–Respondents–Appellants, and Buffalo United Charter School Education Association, NYSUT/AFT, AFL–CIO New York, Respondent–Respondent. Appeal and cross appeals from a judgment (denominated order and judgment) of the Supreme

  6. N.L.R.B. v. Parents Friends, Sp. Living Ctr.

    879 F.2d 1442 (7th Cir. 1989)   Cited 27 times
    Concluding that a corporation that was licensed and regulated by the state, that was funded by the state, and that was operating a state-built facility was not a governmental entity because it was “a not-for-profit corporation operat[ing] a hospital pursuant to a contract with the state as opposed to a statutory duty”

  7. Aramark Corp. v. National Labor Relations Bd.

    179 F.3d 872 (10th Cir. 1999)   Cited 14 times

    Nos. 97-9535, 97-9550. Filed May 28, 1999. On Petition for Review and Cross-Application for Enforcement of an Order of the National Labor Relations Board, (Petition Nos. 12-CA-18704 and 11-CA-17497). David W. Miller, of Baker Daniels, Indianapolis, Indiana, (Philip J. Gibbons, Jr. with him on the briefs), for Petitioner. Howard E. Perlstein, Deputy assistant General Counsel, National Labor Relations Board, Washington, D.C., (Frederick L. Feinstein, General Counsel, Linda Sher, Associate General Counsel

  8. Jefferson County Community Center v. N.L.R.B

    732 F.2d 122 (10th Cir. 1984)   Cited 18 times
    Holding that an entity was not exempt as a political subdivision under section 152"although seven directors are appointed by public agencies" because "a majority of the Board is neither appointed by nor subject to removal by public officials or the general electorate and has no official connection to any governmental body"

  9. Aramark Corp. v. N. L. R. B

    156 F.3d 1087 (10th Cir. 1998)   Cited 1 times

    Nos. 97-9535, 97-9550. Filed September 22, 1998. On Petition for Review and Cross-Application for Enforcement of an Order of the National Labor Relations Board, (Petition Nos. 12-CA-18704 and 11-CA-17497). David W. Miller, of Baker Daniels, Indianapolis, Indiana, (Philip J. Gibbons, Jr. with him on the briefs), for Petitioner. Howard E. Perlstein, Deputy assistant General Counsel, National Labor Relations Board, Washington, D.C., (Frederick L. Feinstein, General Counsel, Linda Sher, Associate General