Hyatt Hotels Corporation d/b/a Hyatt Regency Scottsdale
6 Cited authorities
Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Transportation Management Corp.
462 U.S. 393 (1983) Cited 657 times 11 Legal AnalysesHolding that the employer bears the burden of negating causation in a mixed-motive discrimination case, noting "[i]t is fair that [the employer] bear the risk that the influence of legal and illegal motives cannot be separated."
N.L.R.B. v. Wright Line, a Div. of Wright Line, Inc.
662 F.2d 899 (1st Cir. 1981) Cited 358 times 46 Legal AnalysesHolding that the "but for" test applied in a "mixed motive" case under the National Labor Relations Act
Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Caval Tool Division, Chromalloy Gas Turbine Corp.
262 F.3d 184 (2d Cir. 2001) Cited 20 times 1 Legal AnalysesAffirming the Board's holding that an employee engaged in concerted activity when he made statements about the company's new break policy at an employee meeting called by the employer to address the policy
N.L.R.B. v. Daniel Const. Co.
731 F.2d 191 (4th Cir. 1984) Cited 27 timesHolding that contemporaneous section 8 violations provide evidence of an employer's anti-union animus in the discharge of a particular employee
N.L.R.B. v. Igramo Enterprise, Inc.
310 F. App'x 452 (2d Cir. 2009)Nos. 08-1861-ag (L), 08-2207-ag. February 18, 2009. Petition for review of a decision and order of the National Labor Relations Board. UPON CONSIDERATION WHEREOF, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that the petition for review is DENIED. John Diviney (Alan B. Pearl and Siam Asad Ali, on the brief), Alan B. Pearl Associates, Syosset, NY, for Petitioner. Meredith L. Jason, Supervisory Attorney (Jeffrey L. Horowitz, Attorney, Linda Dreeben, Deputy Associate General Counsel, John H. Ferguson
Rule 801 - Definitions That Apply to This Article; Exclusions from Hearsay
Fed. R. Evid. 801 Cited 19,712 times 77 Legal AnalysesHolding that such a statement must merely be made by the party and offered against that party