§

Howard Johnson Co.

198 N.L.R.B. 763 (N.L.R.B. 1972)
Howard Johnson Co.

7 Cited authorities

  1. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Burns International Security Services, Inc.

    406 U.S. 272 (1972)   Cited 478 times   49 Legal Analyses
    Holding that a successor is not bound to substantive terms of previous collective bargaining agreement

  2. Machinists Local v. Labor Board

    362 U.S. 411 (1960)   Cited 276 times   2 Legal Analyses
    Holding that “a finding of violation which is inescapably grounded on events predating the limitations period” is untimely

  3. Hinson v. N.L.R.B

    428 F.2d 133 (8th Cir. 1970)   Cited 81 times   2 Legal Analyses
    Holding that Section 302 "does not comprehend solely a collective bargaining agreement to the exclusion of any other possible written agreement"

  4. Overnite Transportation Company v. N.L.R.B

    372 F.2d 765 (4th Cir. 1967)   Cited 28 times

    Nos. 10570, 10617. Argued November 4, 1966. Decided February 6, 1967. J.W. Alexander, Jr., Charlotte, N.C. (Ernest W. Machen, Jr., and Blakeney, Alexander Machen, Charlotte, N.C., on brief), for petitioner Overnite Transp. Co. Hugh J. Beins, Washington, D.C., (Michael F. Grdina, Willoughby, Ohio, on brief), for petitioner Teamsters Local Union No. 171. Gary Green, Atty., N.L.R.B. (Arnold Ordman, Gen. Counsel, Dominick L. Manoli, Associate Gen. Counsel, Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. Gen. Counsel, and

  5. N.L.R.B. v. Interstate 65 Corporation

    453 F.2d 269 (6th Cir. 1971)   Cited 22 times

    No. 71-1198. December 30, 1971. Nancy M. Sherman, N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C. (Arnold Ordman, Gen. Counsel, Dominick L. Manoli, Associate Gen. Counsel, Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. Gen. Counsel, Jack H. Weiner, Atty., N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C., on the brief), for petitioner. Morris B. Borowitz, Louisville, Ky., Borowitz, Slyn Russell, Louisville, Ky., for respondent. Before WEICK, CELEBREZZE and PECK, Circuit Judges. JOHN W. PECK, Circuit Judge. The National Labor Relations Board found respondent

  6. Burns I. Detective Ag. v. N.L.R.B

    441 F.2d 911 (2d Cir. 1971)   Cited 18 times
    In Burns, the duty to bargain did not mature until late June, at the point when it became clear that the successor had hired the requisite complement of his predecessor's employees.

  7. N.L.R.B. v. Alamo White Truck Service, Inc.

    273 F.2d 238 (5th Cir. 1959)   Cited 22 times

    No. 17764. December 29, 1959. Allison W. Brown, Jr., Atty., Thomas J. McDermott, Associate Gen. Counsel, Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. Gen. Counsel, Stuart Rothman, Gen. Counsel, Frederick U. Reel, Atty., N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C., for appellant. Theo. F. Weiss, Clemens, Knight, Weiss Spencer, San Antonio, Tex., for respondent. Before HUTCHESON, JONES and WISDOM, Circuit Judges. WISDOM, Circuit Judge. The question for decision is whether the respondent is a successor employer, for the purpose of