§
Hotel Texas

13 Cited authorities

  1. Labor Board v. Katz

    369 U.S. 736 (1962)   Cited 710 times   29 Legal Analyses
    Holding that "an employer's unilateral change in conditions of employment under negotiation" is a violation of the National Labor Relations Act because "it is a circumvention of the duty to negotiate"

  2. Labor Board v. Walton Mfg. Co.

    369 U.S. 404 (1962)   Cited 298 times
    Explaining that the deferential standard of review is appropriate because the "[the ALJ] ... sees the witnesses and hears them testify, while the Board and the reviewing court look only at cold records"

  3. May Stores Co. v. Labor Board

    326 U.S. 376 (1945)   Cited 257 times
    Requiring "a clear determination by the Board of an attitude of opposition to the purposes of the Act to protect the rights of employees generally"

  4. Labor Board v. Crompton Mills

    337 U.S. 217 (1949)   Cited 102 times
    Holding unlawful unilateral changes significantly different from "any which the employer has proposed" during bargaining

  5. N.L.R.B. v. Marcus Trucking Co.

    286 F.2d 583 (2d Cir. 1961)   Cited 65 times
    Treating application of undisputed legal standard to facts as “question of fact” subject to “substantial evidence” standard of § 10(e) of the National Labor Relations Act

  6. Pittsburgh-Des Moines Steel Company v. N.L.R.B

    284 F.2d 74 (9th Cir. 1960)   Cited 17 times
    In Pittsburgh-Des Moines Steel the court found that poor productivity was a valid business justification for refusing to pay a Christmas bonus to production and maintenance workers who had been on strike.

  7. Singer Mfg. Co. v. National Labor Rel. Board

    119 F.2d 131 (7th Cir. 1941)   Cited 37 times
    In Singer Mfg. Co. v. N.L.R.B., 7 Cir., 119 F.2d 131, 134, the court said: "* * * The greatest of rascals may solemnly affirm his honesty of purpose; that does not foreclose a jury from finding from the evidence submitted that he possesses no trace of such innocent quality.

  8. National Labor Relations Bd. v. Nash-Finch Co.

    211 F.2d 622 (8th Cir. 1954)   Cited 20 times
    In Nash-Finch the union had specifically bargained over certain benefits under a hospital insurance plan, as well as Christmas bonuses, but in final negotiation these requests were dropped and did not appear in the collective bargaining agreement.

  9. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Niles-Bement-Pond

    199 F.2d 713 (2d Cir. 1952)   Cited 20 times
    Upholding a Board finding that a Christmas bonus paid "over a substantial period of time and in amount . . . based on the respective wages earned by the recipients" were "wages"

  10. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. International Ass'n of Heat & Frost Insulators & Asbestos Workers

    261 F.2d 347 (1st Cir. 1958)   Cited 8 times

    No. 5378. December 4, 1958. Arnold Ordman, Atty., Washington, D.C., with whom Jerome D. Fenton, Gen. Counsel, Thomas J. McDermott, Assoc. Gen. Counsel, Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. Gen. Counsel, and Frederick U. Reel, Atty., Washington, D.C., were on brief, for petitioner. Henry Wise, Boston, Mass., with whom Robert L. Wise, Boston, Mass., was on brief, for respondents. Before MAGRUDER, Chief Judge, and WOODBURY and HARTIGAN, Circuit Judges. HARTIGAN, Circuit Judge. This is a petition by the National