§

Hotel & Restaurant Employees Union

223 N.L.R.B. 1058 (N.L.R.B. 1976)
Hotel & Restaurant Employees Union

9 Cited authorities

  1. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Burns International Security Services, Inc.

    406 U.S. 272 (1972)   Cited 478 times   49 Legal Analyses
    Holding that a successor is not bound to substantive terms of previous collective bargaining agreement

  2. Labor Board v. Denver Bldg. Council

    341 U.S. 675 (1951)   Cited 494 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Affirming Board's assertion of jurisdiction over activities taking place at local construction site based on finding that "any widespread application of the practices charged might well result in substantially decreasing" the flow of interstate commerce

  3. San Francisco Loc. Joint Exec. Bd. v. N.L.R.B

    501 F.2d 794 (D.C. Cir. 1974)   Cited 12 times

    Nos. 73-1489, 73-1579 and 73-1605. Argued April 5, 1974. Decided June 21, 1974. David Nevins, Washington, D.C., of the bar of the Supreme Court of Minnesota, pro hac vice, by special leave of court, for petitioners. Barry S. Jellison and David J. Salniker were on the brief for petitioners. Robert A. Giannasi, Atty., NLRB, with whom John S. Irving, Deputy Gen. Counsel, Patrick Hardin, Associate Gen. Counsel, and Elliott Moore, Deputy Associate Gen. Counsel, NLRB, were on the brief, for respondent

  4. N.L.R.B. v. Milk Drivers Dairy Emp. L. U. 584

    341 F.2d 29 (2d Cir. 1965)   Cited 18 times

    No. 288, Docket 29130. Argued January 12, 1965. Decided January 26, 1965. Melvin J. Welles, Attorney, National Labor Relations Board (Arnold Ordman, General Counsel, Dominick L. Manoli, Associate General Counsel, Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. General Counsel, and Linda R. Sher, Attorney, NLRB, on the brief), for petitioner. Bruce H. Simon, New York City (Robert S. Savelson, New York City, of counsel, and Cohen Weiss, New York City, on the brief), for respondent. Before SMITH, KAUFMAN and ANDERSON

  5. N.L.R.B. v. L. 254, Bldg. Serv. Emp. Int. U

    376 F.2d 131 (1st Cir. 1967)   Cited 10 times

    No. 6626. April 10, 1967. Elliott C. Lichtman, Washington, D.C., with whom Arnold Ordman, Gen. Counsel, Dominick L. Manoli, Associate Gen. Counsel, Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. Gen. Counsel, and Paul Elkind, Atty., Washington, D.C., were on petition for adjudication in civil contempt, for petitioner. Harold B. Roitman, Boston, Mass., for respondent. Before ALDRICH, Chief Judge, McENTEE, and COFFIN, Circuit Judges. ALDRICH, Chief Judge. This is a petition to hold a union in civil contempt for violations

  6. N.L.R.B. v. Carpenters Local No. 2133

    356 F.2d 464 (9th Cir. 1966)   Cited 9 times

    No. 20324. February 10, 1966. Arnold Ordman, Gen. Counsel, Dominick L. Manoli, Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. Gen. Counsel, Glen M. Bendixsen, Atty., N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C., for petitioner. Donald S. Richardson, Green, Richardson Griswold, Portland, Or., for respondents. Before HAMLEY, HAMLIN and ELY, Circuit Judges. HAMLEY, Circuit Judge: The National Labor Relations Board petitions for enforcement of its order requiring Carpenters Local No. 2133 (Union) to cease and desist recognitional picketing

  7. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Local 3, International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers

    339 F.2d 600 (2d Cir. 1964)   Cited 8 times

    No. 213, Docket 27851. Argued October 23, 1964. Decided December 18, 1964. Solomon I. Hirsh, Atty., National Labor Relations Board, Washington, D.C., (Arnold Ordman, Gen. Counsel, Dominick L. Manoli, Associate Gen. Counsel, Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. Gen. Counsel, and Robert G. Sewell, Atty., National Labor Relations Board, Washington, D.C., on the brief), for petitioner. Harold Stern, New York City (Norman Rothfeld, New York City, on the brief), for respondent. Before FRIENDLY, KAUFMAN and ANDERSON

  8. New York Mailers' Un. No. 6, v. N.L.R.B

    316 F.2d 371 (D.C. Cir. 1963)   Cited 8 times

    No. 16951. Argued December 3, 1962. Decided February 14, 1963. Mr. Gerhard P. Van Arkel, Washington, D.C., with whom Mr. George Kaufmann, Washington, D.C., was on the brief, for petitioner. Mr. Melvin J. Welles, Atty., National Labor Relations Bd., of the bar of the Court of Appeals of New York, pro hac vice, by special leave of court, with whom Messrs. Stuart Rothman, General Counsel, Dominick L. Manoli, Associate Gen. Counsel, and Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. Gen. Counsel, National Labor Relations

  9. Section 151 - Findings and declaration of policy

    29 U.S.C. § 151   Cited 5,092 times   34 Legal Analyses
    Finding that "protection by law of the right of employees to organize and bargain collectively safeguards commerce" and declaring a policy of "encouraging the practice and procedure of collective bargaining"