§

Hotel & Restaurant Employees Local 274 (Stadium Hotel Partners)

314 N.L.R.B. 982 (N.L.R.B. 1994)
Hotel & Restaurant Employees Local 274 (Stadium Hotel Partners)

13 Cited authorities

  1. Fall River Dyeing & Finishing Corp. v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.

    482 U.S. 27 (1987)   Cited 369 times   12 Legal Analyses
    Holding that the new employer must bargain with the old union, if the new employer is a true successor, and discussing factors

  2. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Burns International Security Services, Inc.

    406 U.S. 272 (1972)   Cited 478 times   49 Legal Analyses
    Holding that a successor is not bound to substantive terms of previous collective bargaining agreement

  3. Howard Johnson Co. v. Detroit Local Joint Exec. Bd., Hotel & Rest. Emps. & Bartenders Int'l Union, AFL-CIO

    417 U.S. 249 (1974)   Cited 366 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Holding under NLRA that purchaser of hotel assets was not required to arbitrate with union about its decision not to hire all of seller’s employees

  4. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Browning-Ferris Industries of Pennsylvania, Inc.

    691 F.2d 1117 (3d Cir. 1982)   Cited 339 times   16 Legal Analyses
    Holding that joint employer situation exists only when "two or more employers exert significant control over the same employees . . . [where] they share or co-determine those matters governing essential terms and conditions of employment"

  5. Wallace Corp. v. Labor Board

    323 U.S. 248 (1944)   Cited 162 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Holding that corporation committed unfair labor practice

  6. General Ser. Emp. U. Local No. 73 v. N.L.R.B

    578 F.2d 361 (D.C. Cir. 1978)   Cited 19 times
    Discussing threats, but not statutes of limitations

  7. N.L.R.B. v. Int. Bro. of Elec. Wkrs

    604 F.2d 1091 (8th Cir. 1979)   Cited 11 times
    In NLRB v. International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers, Local 265, 604 F.2d 1091, 1097 (8th Cir. 1979), under circumstances clearly analogous to those involved in the present case, this court addressed the issue of proscribed recognitional picketing under Section 8(b)(7)(A), and the exception to that section for "area standards" picketing.

  8. N.L.R.B. v. Building Const. Trades Council

    578 F.2d 55 (3d Cir. 1978)   Cited 6 times
    In NLRB v. Building Constr. Trades Council, 578 F.2d 55 (3d Cir. 1978), it was contended that primary picketing purportedly protesting violations of area standards did not require the union to petition for an election.

  9. Int'l Chem. Wkrs. U. Loc. 483 v. N.L.R.B

    561 F.2d 253 (D.C. Cir. 1977)   Cited 6 times
    In International Chemical Workers Union Local 483 v. NLRB, 561 F.2d 253 (D.C. Cir. 1977), this court was explicit that "[w]hether [two entities are] joint employers" under the National Labor Relations Act "depends upon the amount of actual and potential control that" the putative joint employer "ha[s] over the * * * employees," id. at 255 (emphasis added).

  10. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Suffolk County District Council of Carpenters

    387 F.2d 170 (2d Cir. 1967)   Cited 10 times

    Nos. 36, 37, Docket 31151, 31152. Argued September 21, 1967. Decided December 13, 1967. Lawrence J. Sherman, Washington, D.C. (Arnold Ordman, Gen. Counsel, Dominick L. Manoli, Associate Gen. Counsel, Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. Gen. Counsel, Nancy M. Sherman, Atty., N.L.R.B., on the brief), for petitioner. Ernest Fleischman, New York City (Delson Gordon, Stephen F. Gordon, New York City, on the brief), for respondent. Before WATERMAN, MOORE and FEINBERG, Circuit Judges. FEINBERG, Circuit Judge:

  11. Section 151 - Findings and declaration of policy

    29 U.S.C. § 151   Cited 5,092 times   34 Legal Analyses
    Finding that "protection by law of the right of employees to organize and bargain collectively safeguards commerce" and declaring a policy of "encouraging the practice and procedure of collective bargaining"