§

Hospital Pavia-Perea

355 N.L.R.B. 1300 (N.L.R.B. 2010)
Hospital Pavia-Perea

9 Cited authorities

  1. New Process Steel v. N.L.R.B.

    560 U.S. 674 (2010)   Cited 141 times   49 Legal Analyses
    Holding that the Board cannot exercise its powers absent a lawfully appointed quorum

  2. United States v. Cote

    51 F.3d 178 (9th Cir. 1995)   Cited 179 times   2 Legal Analyses
    Holding that the law of the case doctrine only applies "when the issue in question was actually considered and decided"

  3. Labor Board v. Donnelly Co.

    330 U.S. 219 (1947)   Cited 128 times
    Holding that a hearing examiner's prior adverse ruling did not prevent him from adjudicating the same case on retrial even though the examiner's initial decision had been reversed for improper exclusion of evidence

  4. Exxon Chemical Patents v. Lubrizol Corp.

    137 F.3d 1475 (Fed. Cir. 1998)   Cited 56 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Holding that the scope of the judgment appealed from, limited to literal infringement, did not preclude adjudication of infringement by the doctrine of equivalents

  5. Luckey v. Miller

    929 F.2d 618 (11th Cir. 1991)   Cited 45 times
    Noting that the doctrine “does not bar consideration of matters that could have been, but were not, resolved in earlier proceedings”

  6. In re Labor Board

    304 U.S. 486 (1938)   Cited 32 times

    PETITION FOR WRITS OF PROHIBITION AND MANDAMUS. No. 21, Original. Argued May 23, 1938. Decided May 31, 1938. 1. To confer jurisdiction upon the Circuit Court of Appeals to review an order of the National Labor Relations Board, the filing and service of the petition are not enough, but a transcript of the Board's proceedings also must be filed with the court. National Labor Relations Act, § 10(d)(e)(f). P. 491. 2. Where a petition for review has been filed and served on the Board, and the petitioner

  7. Augusta Bakery Corp. v. N.L.R.B

    846 F.2d 445 (7th Cir. 1988)   Cited 7 times
    Reserving the question

  8. Bailey v. Henslee

    309 F.2d 840 (8th Cir. 1962)   Cited 18 times
    Noting that a “mandate is to be interpreted reasonably and not in a manner to do injustice”

  9. Wilkinson v. Massachusetts Bonding Ins. Co.

    16 F.2d 66 (5th Cir. 1926)   Cited 6 times

    No. 4725. December 6, 1926. In Error to the District Court of the United States for the Northern District of Texas; William H. Atwell, Judge. Action at law by W.W. Wilkinson, trustee in bankruptcy of the Walker Grain Company, against the Massachusetts Bonding Insurance Company and others. From the judgment, plaintiff brings error. Reversed and remanded. See, also, 3 F.2d 875. Stanley Boykin and H.C. Ray, both of Fort Worth, Tex. (George M. Conner, Capps, Cantey, Hanger Short, and Boykin Ray, all