§

Hospital Metropolitan

334 N.L.R.B. 555 (N.L.R.B. 2001)
Hospital Metropolitan

17 Cited authorities

  1. Allentown Mack Sales & Service, Inc. v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.

    522 U.S. 359 (1998)   Cited 426 times   13 Legal Analyses
    Holding that the Board "is not free to prescribe what inferences from the evidence it will accept and reject, but must draw all those inferences that the evidence fairly demands"

  2. Vincent Industrial Plastics, Inc. v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.

    209 F.3d 727 (D.C. Cir. 2000)   Cited 44 times   3 Legal Analyses
    In Vincent Industrial, we directed the Board to premise every bargaining order on an "explicit[ balanc[ing][of] three considerations: (1) the employees' Section 7 rights [ 29 U.S.C. § 157]; (2) whether other purposes of the [NLRA] override the rights of employees to choose their bargaining representatives; and (3) whether alternative remedies are adequate to remedy the violations of the [NLRA]]."

  3. Lee Lumber & Building Material Corp. v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.

    117 F.3d 1454 (D.C. Cir. 1997)   Cited 27 times   3 Legal Analyses
    Noting that, "[b]ecause affirmative bargaining orders interfere with the employee free choice that is a core principle of the Act," we "view them with suspicion" and demand special justification for them

  4. Exxel/Atmos, Inc. v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.

    28 F.3d 1243 (D.C. Cir. 1994)   Cited 28 times   2 Legal Analyses
    Stressing appropriateness of bargaining order to remedy bad faith bargaining during certification year

  5. Pioneer Inn Associates v. N.L.R.B

    578 F.2d 835 (9th Cir. 1978)   Cited 42 times
    Upholding "contract bar" rule that Board will not conduct decertification election during life of contract even if majority of employees withdraws support from union

  6. Bickerstaff Clay Products Co., v. N.L.R.B

    871 F.2d 980 (11th Cir. 1989)   Cited 25 times
    Holding that union certified as exclusive bargaining agent "is entitled to a continuing presumption of majority status"

  7. Retired Persons Pharmacy v. N.L.R.B

    519 F.2d 486 (2d Cir. 1975)   Cited 44 times
    Affirming an ALJ's decision not to permit an employer to call employees to testify about whether they supported the union as of the withdrawal date because the employer “would clearly have been putting pressure on them to answer favorably” and “[i]f such questioning were allowed, management could withdraw recognition without basis and successfully defend itself by showing a lack of union support which in fact resulted not from employee dissatisfaction but rather from the withdrawal of recognition and subsequent proceedings”

  8. Allied Industrial Workers, AFL-CIO Local Union No. 289 v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.

    476 F.2d 868 (D.C. Cir. 1973)   Cited 48 times
    Noting that "naked information" regarding the filing of a decertification petition without information regarding the number of signatories is insufficient to create good faith doubt of union majority status, even with additional evidence present

  9. Rock-Tenn Co. v. N.L.R.B

    69 F.3d 803 (7th Cir. 1995)   Cited 14 times

    Nos. 95-1347 95-1706 ARGUED SEPTEMBER 8, 1995 DECIDED NOVEMBER 3, 1995 Larry E. Forrester (argued), James Chadwick Hatmaker, Atlanta, GA, for Rock-Tenn Company. Charles P. Donnelly, Jr., National Labor Relations Board, Contempt Litigation Branch, Washington, DC, Aileen A. Armstrong, John D. Burgoyne (argued), Steven F. Rappaport, National Labor Relations Board, Appellate Court, Enforcement Litigation, Washington, DC, William T. Little, National Labor Relations Board, Region 25, Indianapolis, IN,

  10. Beverly Farm Fdn. v. Nat. Lab. Relations Bd.

    144 F.3d 1048 (7th Cir. 1998)   Cited 8 times
    Reviewing the Board's decision that the employer had violated the Act by taking anti-union actions and declaring a premature impasse in collective bargaining negotiations